Wednesday, November 05, 2008

BECAUSE OF YOU...

It was one of those indelible moments. You know, the ones where you will never forget where you were or what you were doing when it was announced. Through my tears, I watched Barack Obama address a sea of faces – all kinds of faces – young, old, black, white, Asian, and Hispanic. I listened to his message of hope and unity and I thought about where we have been, where we have come from.

I thought about so many of you who have worked so hard and so tirelessly to educate and to unite our communities. I thought about the decades of work that have gone in to this fight against racism and bigotry and the people I have met along the way. Each and every one of us HAVE made a difference – we haven’t won the war – but we HAVE left our mark.

Through my joyous weeping, I dedicated every tear to anyone who had spoken out against racism, who had refused to silently accept bigotry, who had stared hate in the face and turned it away. Because of you – last night was possible. Because of you – the American dream that all things are possible became a reality for millions more. Thank you.

83 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Some victory you guys won.

    Prop 8 passed in California.

    Affirmative Action has been banned in Nebraska.

    I'm hearing similar anti-Marxist measures have gone through in other states.

    You haven't won anything except another Ruling Class puppet.

    Only stupid leftists would celebrate this phony "victory".

    PS: Obama won't pay your mortgage, and Obama won't end the war. Obama is an empty promise to a braindead electorate.

    And this country is still split down the middle.

    Today, President Obama thinks to himself, "Suckers!"

    ROTFLMAO.

    ReplyDelete
  3. First thoughts on the election

    November 5, 2008

    It would seem to be the worst of all possible results—an Obama presidency and much larger Democratic majorities in Congress. What can't be erased is the picture of adoring white faces in the crowd at Grant Park in Chicago during Obama's victory speech. They were the faces of people who had just been granted racial deliverance. Hanging on his every word, on the verge of tears of joy.

    Granted, these pathetic white people do not represent the majority of white people. The CNN exit poll data indicate that 55% of whites voted for McCain, including 57% of white males and 53% of white females. In the 2004 election, 58% of whites voted for Bush.

    The only white age group to vote for Obama was the 18–29 year old category—a category still under the sway of the educational system and filled with youthful idealism. 54% of them voted for Obama. Quite a few of them will grow out of it by the time they are 30—much sooner if they begin to see that the job market is stacked against them and that the Obama administration is pushing quotas.

    But the bottom line is that McCain could not hold Bush's advantage among whites. This is doubtless due to the extreme unpopularity of the Bush administration—an administration that not only gave us the disastrous neocon war in Iraq but also did absolutely nothing to win the affection of its base by standing up on issues like immigration.

    And the McCain campaign labored under the economic crisis that, in the public's mind at least, was linked to the Bush administration. There is no question that a lot of white people put their economic fears ahead of anything else. In an economy where good jobs with good benefits are increasingly difficult to find for working people, one has to sympathize. This is another area where the Bush administration did nothing to help its natural constituency.

    Nevertheless, the Republican Party remains a white party. Whites represented almost 90% of Republican votes cast in this election. Minorities voted overwhelmingly for Obama (95% of blacks, 66% of Latinos, 61% of Asians). (The LA Times says only 30% of Latinos voted for McCain — this despite McCain being the Republican poster boy for amnesty for illegals.) So much for Karl Rove's idea of expanding the Republican vote by favoring mass immigration of non-whites.

    In fact, the big change between 2004 and 2008 is that much higher percentages of minorities voted for Obama than voted for Kerry. (Kerry was supported by 88% blacks, 53% Latino, 56% Asian). This shift in the direction of the Democrats is quite a bit greater than the shift among white people. Even though whites were less racially polarized in this election, the minorities were more polarized. There is little question that the Democrats have become the party of the minorities.

    And the electorate itself was less white (77% in 2004, 74% in 2008). The clock keeps ticking.

    In a previous editorial, we suggested that if Obama were to achieve a landslide victory, it would lead to immediate and drastic change desired by the far left. The landslide did not materialize, and no one is suggesting a mandate for drastic change. We suspect that the new administration will tread lightly and attempt to retain its white constituency by not openly advocating quotas or other issues that needlessly alienate whites. That is perhaps their best strategy for retaining power for two terms.

    But such a strategy must go up against increased expectations among blacks and other minorities that their time has come. The problem for Obama and the Democrats is that white discrimination against blacks and Latinos is pretty much irrelevant to their achievement patterns. Group differences in IQ and impulse control are far larger contributors, and Obama's election is not going to change these traits.

    So in the end, the only way that Obama can satisfy his black and Latino constituents is to get results by implementing programs like quota-style affirmative action and transfer payments that will alienate whites in droves.

    A true post-racial leader would fight discrimination while working to convince blacks and Latinos to accept their lower socio-economic positions as an inevitable outcome of a free market. But quite obviously, the probability of that happening is right up there with pigs flying and hell freezing over.

    In the end, we think that in the long run Obama's election will indeed contribute to the racial polarization of the country. Our day will come.

    ReplyDelete
  4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The gay marriage proposals in California and Florida would have passed, except Bl@cks voted 70% against it!!!

    So you stupid libtards who cry about gay rights being a civil rights issue just got voted down by your favorite "pet" projects!!!

    Talk about instant karma

    lol

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ahhhhh is the racist whining. You'll be whining at least the next 4 years. And we did win 'tard. Took an overwhelming majority in congress. Obama wins, dems, win! OH MY GOD LIBERALS WIN LIBERALS WIN! LIBERALS WIN.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The election of Barack Obama as president of the United States is a good thing for white nationalism

    by Greg Johnson
    The Occidental Quarterly

    Whites will regain control over our nation and our destiny only when we have a change of consciousness. First, we must again think of ourselves as a distinct ethnic group with distinct interests—interests that often conflict with those of other ethnic groups. Second, we must again believe that we are entitled—nay, obligated—to take our own side when our interests conflict with those of other groups.

    Currently white identity and interests have been suppressed by the ideologies of universalism, multiculturalism, and white guilt. White consciousness and pride still exist, of course, but have been driven into the subconscious mind. Our race is a sleeping giant. The task of white nationalism is to waken it. And Barack Obama can only help us.

    The recent presidential campaign has been racially divisive and polarizing, and that is a good thing. Countless whites have become newly conscious of their distinct racial identity and interests. Of course the Republican candidate, John McCain, did nothing to encourage this process. Nothing, that is, until he added Sarah Palin to the Republican ticket, which brought about a vicious and polarizing reaction from the left, particularly Jews. Millions of whites, most of them from the productive minority that carries the rest of the country, spontaneously identified with Palin. Thus the establishment’s hatred for her—and, by extension, them—was very instructive. Many became not just aware, but fighting mad.

    But a McCain victory would only have dissipated this tendency to greater white racial consciousness. If McCain won, it would have been blamed on Republican racism, even though Obama would presumably have been defeated by racist Democrats who would have refused to vote for him. Republicans never would have considered voting for a Democrat in the first place, black or not. Nevertheless, a McCain administration would do everything in its power not to further white racial consciousness.

    An Obama presidency, however, will only intensify racial polarization and stimulate greater white racial consciousness and self-assertiveness. More of the sleepers will waken.

    Whites, furthermore, will retake our nation only when we realize, finally, that it has been taken away from us. For the better part of a century, the United States has been ruled by a coalition of rootless white plutocrats and ethnocentric Jews, with the power of the Jews steadily growing at the expense of the whites. This ruling elite uses non-whites to gain advantage over the white majority.

    For the white elites, it is more a status game than anything else. These people feel superior to lower class whites by advancing the interests of non-whites at the expense of those people: integrating those people’s schools and neighborhoods, sacrificing those people’s jobs, families, and futures with Affirmative Action, etc.

    For Jews it is a much more serious game. They are after power. They use racial integration and non-white immigration to destroy the white working and middle classes (the kind of people who would vote for a racial nationalism other than Zionism), and they use affirmative action to crowd out the white elites (since there are not enough Jews to replace the white elite).

    It is very difficult, however, to convince most whites that our country is ruled by race-traitors and aliens who govern on our backs and against our interests. It is hard, because most people will not listen to an argument, much less read the 624 pages of Wilmot Robertson’s The Dispossessed Majority. Most people believe their eyes, and nothing else. And when they looked at their televisions, they saw white men in the White House.

    Now they will see Barack Obama. That represents progress. It is truth in advertising. The symbolism now reveals rather than conceals the substance. This has not been our country for a long time. And now it no longer looks like our country.

    There is no telling how Barack Obama will govern their country. There is no point in examining his platform or promises. He is a politician, after all. It is easy to tell when he is lying: his lips move. It is likely, however, that Obama will turn out rather like Bill Clinton. Both men may be leftists by conviction. But, for them, there is something far more important than their convictions, namely, themselves. They are posturing, narcissistic empty suits.

    Obama, like Clinton, will probably begin his administration with an orgy of high-minded oratory and high-priced social uplift programs, rapidly wear out his welcome, suffer a series of humiliating defeats, and end his administration as a centrist: exhausted, cynical, morally-compromised, an object of near-universal scorn. Despite this, Obama might gain re-election, if the Republicans nominate another old, feeble moderate like Bob Dole or John McCain—someone fit only to lose gracefully. In fact, I would bank on it.

    This is a good thing for white nationalists for two reasons. First, it is probably best that Obama not be able to enact far left programs. Second, the threat of such programs will energize the right.

    During the Clinton years, there was a great deal of energy on the right. Remember the conservative writers and commentators who offered principled, passionate, and inspiring critiques of liberalism—only to metamorphose into unprincipled Republican shills when George W. Bush was elected? Remember the conservative idealism and activism—exploited by phonies like Newt Gingrich? There was also, frankly, a lot of nasty personal hatred of Bill Clinton and his wife. But hatred, like all forms of energy, can be channeled into good things.

    Obama (and his wife) will create similar energy on the right. And this time white nationalists are positioned to channel this energy into advancing our agenda. To give just one example: Now that a non-white has been elected president, it is possible to mobilize new energies and funds to abolish Affirmative Action as unnecessary.

    Finally, in addition to Obama, the unfolding economic crisis—which looks more and more like a Greater Depression—will provide immense opportunities for white nationalists. For decades, movement people have been saying that the white masses will not be receptive to our message until there is a major economic downturn. There is a lot of truth in this view, although it has also functioned as an excuse for inactivity. Well, the downturn is here, and it is imperative that nationalists invest in the infrastructure necessary to get our message out to an increasingly receptive white majority.
    Now, some might think it odd to ask for funds in an economic downturn. But, first, it is possible to profit from an economic downturn, and, moreover, every white person with the capital and knowledge has a duty to profit from the system’s decline. If the right people profit, it will help us create a better world. Second, what kind of opposition only functions when the system flourishes and decides to pinch its pennies and pull its punches when the system is on the ropes? After the crash of 1929, the Communists piled on and made the 1930s the Red Decade.
    The Occidental Quarterly

    ReplyDelete
  7. R.I.P. America
    1776-2008

    ReplyDelete
  8. The heavy traffic on Stormfront isn't do to awakened whites going there, but rather those making up "lists", if you know what I mean.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Yes, the Left will be making lists and checking it twice.

    The smart WN have already made themselves smaller targets.

    Oppression is coming.

    ReplyDelete
  10. This election has proved that our system of public education is an absolute failure.

    ReplyDelete
  11. An Obama win good for WN? Please, an Obama win is a sign of the times. By winning in landslide fashion it is a clear sign that racist an intolerance is over. The United States is a land where any man or woman can rise to be the president. Racism is over.

    ReplyDelete
  12. The race business will be as big as ever. The whole Obama campaign was all about race and nothing but race.

    97 Percent voted for this candidate because of the color of his skin.

    That's racism in my book.

    No, racism is with America to stay.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Yup, almost 100 percent of the black community voted for Obama, and you idiots here have the gall to say racism is over.

    ReplyDelete
  14. There is an old saying: "America, Love it or leave it." We followed G W down the road to ruin because he was our president. You should stop your whining step up and be an American or get the fuck out.

    ReplyDelete
  15. More Of The Same Only Worse

    By Larry Pinkney (former Black Panther)


    “I believe that there will ultimately be a clash between the oppressed and those who do the oppressing. I believe that there will be a clash between those who want freedom, justice, and equality for everyone and those who want to continue the system of exploitation. I believe that there will be that kind of clash, but I don’t think it will be based on the color of the skin…”
    Malcolm X

    November 05, 2008 "BlackCommentator" -- -If the masses of people in this nation knew or had known the pertinent facts pertaining to the war mongering “we can fight the war better,” pro-apartheid Zionist, corporate Wall Street-backed, slippery tongued Barack Obama, it is doubtful they would have been so thoroughly bamboozled and hoodwinked to their own detriment and that of the world. Wall Street and the corporate media, however, have, to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars, engaged in a relentless, ruthless, and absolutely unprecedented campaign of corporate branding and marketing on behalf of Barack Obama, with the peoples of the United States as their targets.

    Assuming that the corporate Wall Street elite and its concomitant opinion-forming, omission, and misinformation machinery of the U.S. corporate media successfully installs their favorite choice - Democratic Party Republicrat Barack Obama - as the first colored President of the U.S. Empire, the majority of people in the United States are in for a rude awakening in the form of increased economic austerity, internal political repression, deepened racial disharmony, external U.S. military adventurism, and an endless stream of misleading disinformation from the corporate government. The peoples of the world will face intensified imperialistic and military assault and attempts at U.S. hegemony. This time, however, the imperialism of the U.S. Empire will be conveniently spearheaded, condoned and rationalized by its newest and most potent weapon: the dangerously double-talking “Emperor” in black face - Barack Obama. Moreover, in one fell and foul swoop, the corporate / military elite of the U.S. Empire intends to utilize Barack Obama as the “messiah” (created by none other than corporate America and its corporate media) to neutralize and destroy the ongoing Black liberation struggle for justice and equality in this nation, and in people’s liberation struggles throughout the world.

    In relative short order - inside the United States itself - under a Barack Obama presidency, the living conditions of the majority of Black, White, Brown, Red, and Yellow peoples will continue to steadily and massively deteriorate while the corporate Wall Street barons prolong their glut of the every day people’s finances, resources, hopes, and dreams. Under an Obama presidency those non Blacks who stand in opposition to Barack Obama’s de facto pro Wall Street backers and their blood-sucking policies will be branded as racists and traitors, while those Blacks who oppose Obama’s policies will be ignored and/or branded as fringe radicals and traitors. Thus, the horrors of the U.S. Empire will continue unabated, and in many respects, under Barack Obama, actually worsen. The blame for the deteriorating economy and continued war will of course quickly be laid by the Obama / Biden regime and the Democratic Party Republicrats on the previous Bush / Cheney regime, despite the fact that it was the complicity of the Democratic Party itself with the Bush / Cheney Republican Republicrat regime that facilitated the despicable policies and practices of the Bush / Cheney regime. The fact is that the Democratic and Republican Parties are de facto Republicrats with the objective of exploiting the majority of people and maintaining U.S. Empire abroad.

    After the Democratic Party Republicrats so-called election euphoria and celebrating is over, the Obama / Biden Republicrat regime will get down to the business of placing the ongoing exploitation of the every day people of this nation on fast track. The masses of Black Americans, along with the oppressed and exploited Brown, Red, Yellow, and White peoples of this nation will learn first hand that, notwithstanding the deceptive Obama rhetoric, exploitation nationally and internationally will be intensified. The “clash between those who want freedom, justice, equality for everyone and those who want to continue the system of exploitation” about which Malcolm X referred, will be intensified under Barack Obama, with Obama representing the interests of the oppressors. The political contradictions in this regard will also be increasingly obvious.

    Those so-called leftist and progressives who were and are collaborators with U.S. Empire will, for a time, try to pretend that their support of Barack Obama was not a sell out, and that they simply need more time to persuade the U.S. Empire’s colored corporate emperor to do the right thing. Meanwhile, Black, Brown, Red, Yellow, and White peoples will be enduring an unprecedented rate of economic and social suffering. The anger of the people will ultimately peak and explode, as a result of having bought into false hope and raised expectations. This is precisely why the U.S. corporate government has already made military contingency plans to contain and massively quash dissention within the United States. Barack Obama will serve to provide his corporate / military masters with colored political cover for political repression in this nation; and he will have already provided a small respite of wiggling room for them in this regard. Nevertheless, as brutal reality forces the proverbial scales of blindness to drop from eyes of the masses, it will become crystal clear that the supposed “change” to which Barack Obama referred in his campaign rhetoric, was nothing more than a vicious ruse of double-speak by him, backed by his corporate and military handlers. Indeed, the emperor will be shown to “have no clothes.” But what of the fate of millions of Black, White, Brown, Red, and Yellow peoples inside the U.S.? How many horrible sacrifices will have been, and will yet need to be made by the people in order to get the boot of economic blood-sucking and political repression off their / our necks?

    The “clash,” to which Malcolm X referred, “between those who want freedom, justice, and equality for everyone and those who want to continue the system of exploitation” will deepen, as will repression and systemic contradictions. The “clash” will have, by necessity, as Malcolm X suggested, gone beyond “the color of the skin.” Notwithstanding his double speak rhetoric, it will become clear to people that a president Barack Obama supports and wants to “continue the system of exploitation” at home and abroad. Despite continued double speak and corporate disinformation and misinformation, it will be become undeniably clear that a president Barack Obama is the servant of the corporate/ military / prison apparatus of U.S. Empire, and a key facilitator of exploitation and political repression inside and outside the United States.

    Building a real, grass roots peoples’ movement inside the United States will then, in some respects, be more challenging but by no means impossible. Notwithstanding the political repression and incessant disinformation that for a certainty will be emanating from the Obama / Biden Democratic Republicrats and their cronies, a genuine peoples’ movement will be, of necessity, the order of the day.

    It is no mere coincidence that Democratic Party Republicrat, Barack Obama, had the unheard of amount of approximately 600 million dollars in his political campaign coffer compared with fellow Republican Party Republicrat, John McCain’s, approximately 100 million campaign coffer dollars. This fact alone should give some crucial insight into the despicable financial role played by corporations, and their outrageous, unacceptable, and massively inordinate amount of influence and control over the electoral system in this so-called democracy. Most of this money is blood money, based upon exploitation from the corporate Wall Street and military corporate elite. This fact alone gives yet another good indication as to what to expect under an Obama presidency. It is totally reprehensible and unacceptable and an utter mockery of democracy.

    BlackCommentator.com Editorial Board Member, Larry Pinkney, is a veteran of the Black Panther Party, the former Minister of Interior of the Republic of New Africa, a former political prisoner and the only American to have successfully self-authored his civil/political rights case to the United Nations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. In connection with his political organizing activities in opposition to voter suppression, etc., Pinkney was interviewed in 1988 on the nationally televised PBS NewsHour, formerly known as The MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour. For more about Larry Pinkney see the book, Saying No to Power: Autobiography of a 20th Century Activist and Thinker, by William Mandel [Introduction by Howard Zinn]. (Click here to read excerpts from the book). Click here to contact Mr. Pinkney.

    ReplyDelete
  16. An Obama win good for WN? Please, an Obama win is a sign of the times. By winning in landslide fashion it is a clear sign that racist an intolerance is over. The United States is a land where any man or woman can rise to be the president. Racism is over.--Raoul

    You're very simple-minded, aren't you?

    ReplyDelete
  17. It's a tuff postition being anti-racist. Racism in society will exist as long as there is race. Race will exist (in their minds) as long as there is a white race. Without the white race though, there is no society as we know it.

    ReplyDelete
  18. ROTFLMAO!

    Yeah Lefties, you guys got played for suckers alright!

    Zionist war hawk pegged to be Obama's Chief of Staff.

    Here

    ReplyDelete
  19. The war in Iraq will continue. I don't see Obama bringing them home. He can't.

    When the groids realize he ain't going to be able to fill their gas tanks and pay thier mortgage I wonder what will happen.

    Jeez, you have to be stupid to believe the government can do that for you anyway.

    The race-pimps will still be in business as well.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Whine, bitches whine. OBAMA WINS OBAMA WINS. HE WILL SAVE US FROM THE EVIL GEORGE STUPID BUSH. OH YESSSSS

    ReplyDelete
  21. Nikki, it appears someone who was a cousin of Deb Leshkevich showed up on VNN....

    Here

    quote

    First off his blog was written to wash away his guilt. He planned the whole thing, and anyone that really knew him (which none of you do/did), you would know this has nothing to do with anything but complete mental illness. If he were a real man he would have walked away, which is something my cousin was never able to do because of his threats. But ignorance will lead you to believe otherwise. Deb was the heart of her family, and raised her children well, despite his hate and anger (which had nothing to do with her because he was like this from day 1). She tried to make the best of it, to keep her children safe. Ask my family why his children turned on him and they will tell you that their environment was not safe. He was a sorry person, and you all are manipulated by his words. We were convinced by his actions--didn't need his fake words to convince me he was the victim. My cousin lived in fear the entire time they were together, so the next time anyone calls my cousin a whore, think about yourself, and how disgusting you are to believe that crap in the blog. AWWWWW---poor Jim suffered SSSSOOOO much. So much he had to act like a _ussy in the end and kill his wife that he LOVED so much. The ONLY people that even have the right to say they are suffering are Deb's family. Her children lost a MOTHER----

    more....

    Half of you never even knew Jim personally, nor did you know Deb. My question to you all...how could you sit there and judge based on his ignorance, and that sick blog? You didn't know the pain and suffering his family endured living with him. He was NOT a hero, nor was he a man. He attempted to intimidate anyone that was stronger than him because he was a coward, and that is what cowards do. Look up the true meaning of coward, and I am sure you will be convinced. This is not a racial incident, it is a mental person that never took care of himself, and now my family has to live with that. A man does NOT threaten people to get his way, and a MAN walks away from his pain. But, Deb is the person that was in pain because the quality of her life was stripped away by this mental patient. HE cheated, HE was abusive, and HE was NOT a good husband, father, or a provider. HE didn't support the family any more than his wife contributed. So before any of you call my cousin a whore, and her daughter a liar, get your facts straight. YES, his father was black, and he was a MAN. Maybe Jim couldn't face that truth. It's sad that ignorance will lead you to believe that he is a hero. How sad that because of that, you will continue living thinking you are right. We were not created to hate for any reason. Figure out why you are living this way, and why you are breeding so much hate so this doesn't happen to you. There is still time to redeem.

    ReplyDelete
  22. "Antifa" terrorists love to sift through the "muck", don't they? I'm sure your own muck is pretty foul.

    Here's a few words from Nick Griffin about the outcome of the "(s)election":

    An outgoing Republican President leaves behind him an American economy in free fall, and a Democrat wins the race to replace him. No surprise in the USA then.

    Obama’s inevitable victory was against a liberal puppet of the plutocrats whose greed has wrecked the economy not just of America but of the entire world. This is not the result of some zeitgeist change in the USA that heralds a bright new leftist dawn of peace and harmony under a brilliant new leader who will heal ills just by touching the afflicted.

    Obama was elected because McCain represented the party which Americans blame for turning the cash withdrawal machines they called houses into giant millstones of ever increasing debt and despair. While Obama’s undeniable charisma and brilliant Internet campaign played an important role in his victory, in the end this was not so much about the Democrats winning as it was a matter of the Republicans losing.

    McCain’s poll ratings tracked the Dow Jones stock market index and he was doomed when he stated that the fundamentals of the American economy were sound on the very day that Bear Sterns collapsed. That’s all there is to it. The Obama halo is relative to his opponent, and within weeks of his not having an opponent that halo will begin to lose its lustre.

    And so it should. Because, unnoticed by Americans — or rather, unreported by the liberal-left media — Barak Obama played a key role in the creation of the sub-prime disaster that has propelled him to power. The disaster started when a ‘community organizer’ in Chicago named Madeline Talbott began to use the 1977 Community Reinvestment Act to build her political influence among the city’s black community.

    The CRA itself was a piece of bankster greed dressed up as PC folly. The politicians who passed it thought they were voting to make it easier for poor people — minorities especially — to get mortgages despite having bad credit ratings. The banksters who wanted it passed wanted to be relieved of the inconvenient shackles of prudence that prevented them from getting another huge tranche of US society into unrepayable and hence highly profitable debt.

    Talbott made a lucrative career out of suing or threatening institutions over real or perceived ‘discrimination’ against blacks, and the CRA gave her the opportunity to take them to the cleaners. She set up a direct action campaign group, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) and set about intimidating various banks into giving loans to poor blacks — and out of court settlement payouts to her.

    She was greatly helped in this when she hooked up with a slick and highly capable young community activist in Chicago, who she hired to train her ACORN agitators. Her new friend, one Barak Obama, taught them confrontational tactics learned from various 1960s Black Power activists he idolised (his favourite was Malcolm X), and secured campaign money from the left-philanthropic Woods Fund.

    This helped ACORN secure its greatest triumph, when Talbott in 1993 persuaded US mortgage giant Fannie Mae to roll out a $55 million national pilot programme to give mortgages to people with “troubled credit histories”. The rest, as they say, is history — except for the suffering yet to be endured by untold millions whose lives are going to be savaged by the Second Great Depression caused when the banksters/black agitators’ boom went bust.

    Still, the McCain camp were too PC, and too heavily implicated in the disaster themselves, to raise these facts as a campaign issue. Obama’s role in its genesis is now academic, as will be his handling of it now that he’s in charge, because the ‘US century’ is over in any case. The American economy has been gutted and destroyed by decades of free trade suicide, and there is nothing in Obama’s policy pronouncements to suggest he can change this.

    The place that took over from Birmingham and Britain as the high tech workshop of the world now has an economic profile more akin to a Third World country, with the export of minerals, food and other raw materials being more important than the export of finished manufactured goods. For a decade now, the USA has racked up enormous debts and sold off vital assets in order to finance a lifestyle its increasingly unproductive population enjoyed as the world’s ‘consumers of last resort’.

    As a direct result of this free trade lunacy, the economic leadership of the world has been handed on a plate to the Far East, and the United States is now an economic basket case.

    At the same time, imperial over-reach in Iraq and Afghanistan has involved the USA in wars it cannot afford, which it cannot win, but withdrawal from which (as promised by Obama, and rightly so) will be a national humiliation.

    Add to this the fact that mass Mexican and Third World migration has set the USA on course to having its European-American founders become a minority in their own country by 2040, and it is clear that, on top of seeing the end of the American century, we are in fact witnessing the death of America as anything other than a geographical expression.

    The election of Barak Obama certainly will in all probability speed this process up to some extent, but the long-term historical trend was set years ago, and the question of who is in charge of rearranging the deckchairs on the US Titanic is actually of very little significance.

    There is only one possibility of this analysis proving wrong: Operation Apollo. This is Obama’s proposal to spend vast sums of money in a crash programme to end America’s (and hence the West’s) deadly dependence on oil in general and Middle Eastern oil in particular.

    If he actually has the stamina and political skill to stand up to the vested interests that will oppose this (namely the oil companies and haulage lobbies who will not want this change, the banks which will want to finance things with faster returns, and the liberal welfare parasites whose living comes from overseeing hand-outs to the mainly black underclass), then Obama could actually make a difference and become a significant historical figure for good.

    Unfortunately, he is far more likely to end up increasing handouts to those he sees as ‘his people’, and to blow the last American capital on alleviating the symptoms of America’s energy-starved decline than on addressing the problem itself.

    If he does so, Obama’s Presidency will end up as much of a disappointment as Tony Blair’s leadership did in Britain.

    Far from marking the end of race as a factor in American politics, that will end up polarising the place as never before. Not that that is likely to benefit any white nationalist party in America, as there is none, nor is there one upon the horizon. The place is a political disaster zone of self-indulgent juvenile extremism and lack of self-discipline.

    Hence, when Obama does disappoint, the reaction will not produce anything worthwhile, but simply crude racist ugliness. At its worst, a string of white supremacist nuts and disgruntled ex-jarheads will be arrested plotting to assassinate him, and one will succeed, sparking not just pogroms but the legalised dispossession of a white America paralysed by fear and guilt.

    For at the very heart of Barak Obama there is a deep-seated anti-white racism. Of course he disguised it during his brilliant campaign, but it oozes from between the lines of his autobiography, Dreams from My Father. In this he tells how he deliberately turned his back against his own multi-racial identity in order to give himself a 100% black persona.

    He lives with a ‘nightmare vision’ of black powerlessness. He seethes over injustices and prejudices that he never encountered. He detests his own white grandmother when she is frightened by an aggressive black beggar. He is, in short, a true racist bigot.

    “Black people have reason to hate,” says Obama. He is, outwardly, a handsome man, but a deep and abiding ugliness lurks within. He is an articulate man, but the problem is not how the leader of a dying super -power sounds, nor even what he says; it’s what he does. We must of course wait to find out, but find out we will.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Republicans are the biggest whiners in existence. Most of them are still whining about Clinton. Rush Limbaugh started whining before the election was over but you know what? The more they whine the more I laugh.

    ReplyDelete
  24. American leftists are so simple minded:

    Nick Griffin is the leader of the BNP: The BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY.

    He's NOT a REPUBLICAN, dolt. He's not even an American!

    Understand, most Nationalits are NOT Republicans.

    Americans are soooooo goddamned stupid...

    (sigh)

    ReplyDelete
  25. Liberals win liberals win and you can't do nothing about it. Nah-Nah-nah whine some more. YOU WANT SOME CHEESE WITH THAT WHINE?

    ReplyDelete
  26. You can pack the government with shitskins but it won't change anything: We will continue on Fuck them and fuck you Nikki!

    ReplyDelete
  27. Nikki, this the most pathetic thing you ever wrote. Drunk? Btw, they wrote the same stuff when Mugabe became president.

    "Who wrote the article?"

    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.com/

    ReplyDelete
  28. I thought it was pretty good. Keep up the good work, Nikki.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Holsten a veggie in a nursing home. Bill in jail, Obama as President does it get any better than this?

    ReplyDelete
  30. Obama promised change, but we’re just getting more of the same. He’s tapped Jew Rahm Emanuel to be his Chief of Staff, and Jew David Axelrod to be his Senior Adviser.

    And all those white liberals thought he really meant it about being against more war in the Middle East.

    Idiots.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Dow down 800 points since 11/4/08!

    Hope it continues to plunge!

    Muhahahaha!

    ReplyDelete
  32. @raoul

    "By winning in landslide fashion it is a clear sign that racist an intolerance is over."

    A landslide is something different, just look up the number of votes. But, have your little dream (dreams aren't real) and watch how fast the puppet Obama changes ... very little.

    The first ones to start bitching will be... the blacks. A black woman whom I heard speaking said: "with Obama, I don't have to worry about paying my mortgage".

    "Whes da money?"

    ReplyDelete
  33. Raoul isn't that smart. I'm thinking mildly retarded.

    ReplyDelete
  34. People who see the world through race are very sad individuals. Obama is your president now. Real Americans will stand by him. Just like if McCain had been elected he would be our president and we would need to stand by him.

    ReplyDelete
  35. "People who see the world through race are very sad individuals."


    You mean like the 99% of blacks that voted fro OBAMA because he was black? No, I don't think any of them were thinking about race at all.

    Eat me, you pathetic sniveling liberal!

    ReplyDelete
  36. America took the single largest step towards becoming a communist nation in my life time with this alleged election of a Marxist-Leninist. In April, I began describing Obama as a Marxist. My mail box filled up with angry email insisting that Obama is a "progressive," liberal Democrat. This is the ignorance of a dumbed down population who have no idea what Marxism means: The political and economic ideas of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels as developed into a system of thought that gives class struggle a primary role in leading society from bourgeois democracy under capitalism to a socialist society and thence to communism. Redistribution of wealth is the major tenet of communism. It is also Obama's plan. Right up to the day before the election, a few braves souls in the media were finally referring to his real political ideology. Of course, Obama's cult followers immediately attempted to ridicule or slap them down. --Devvy

    ReplyDelete
  37. Listen to the right wing morons. Whine or as Steve Holsten bless his vegetable ass used to say: Listen To The Dick Sucking Pussies, Whine."


    Keep on whining, bitches. You'll be whining for the next 4 years. Even more when Obama is reelected. OH YES, YOUR MISERY IS JUST BEGINNING. WELCOME TO THE FIRST DAY OF YOUR TOTALLY MISERABLE EXISTENCE. BEST KILL YOUSELF, RIGHT NOW, 'TARD.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Man, leftists are as much lousy winners as they are sore losers.

    The one cold comfort we can take in this will be the complete chaos amoung all those mulattoes, Mestizos, Quadroons and others as the only race to build and maintain a true civilizaiton that benefited the most people on the planet is gone. But I predict that Russia will remain a White nation and many of the last Whites will actually retreat to it. The rest of the world will devolve into a world wide Africa, with piracy, genocides, disease epidemics and other devasting problems that will drop the world population by hundreds of millions if not billions. This is a scientific certainty, it has been understood by biological scientists for decades. What we are witnessing is the beginning of what will be a huge world-wide crash that is biologically necessary and inevitable.

    Political affiliation will not matter one bit, believe me.

    ReplyDelete
  39. DOW drops down below 9,000.

    The Dow Jones industrial average (INDU) lost around 443 points, or 4.9%. The two-session decline of 929 points, or 9.7%, marked the biggest two-session point loss ever and the biggest two-session percentage decline in 21 years, according to Dow Jones.

    Beautiful. Just...beautiful.

    ReplyDelete
  40. From the "Liberals Are Good Americans" File:

    Obama Supporters Wave Communist Flag at Celebration Rally!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LCMcv1VF4uQ

    Wow, it's gonna be agreat four years for the USSA! LOL!

    ReplyDelete
  41. While you whine about Obama, I laugh. You're going to be whining for at least 4 years. Whine a little louder, will ya? MUAHAHAHAHAAHA


    DUMBASS.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Yeah the instability of the Dow Jones is why we got rid of George W. Bush, worst president in US history.


    So you want to whine? Whine about Bush he is the one who destroyed our economy.

    ReplyDelete
  43. God I just love to hear right winger closet homosexual racists whine. When I hear that I know something is going right in the world. They whined all through the Clinton administration.

    The great thing is that Obama has a clear mandate from the people. This and a democratic congress means we can start fixing the problems that Bush created. I know it will never happen.....but if there was Justice in the world Bush would wind up before a Iraqi Jury being tried as a war criminal.

    ReplyDelete
  44. I think Jeffrey Hart, former senior editor at National Review, and former speechwriter for Reagan and Nixon, says it best:

    "So here we are in 2008. With its indispensable Southern and, more widely, evangelical base, the Republican Party has become the stupid party.

    "In the election, the McCain-Palin ticket received the highest percentage of votes in South Carolina, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia. The Southern Strategy succeeded. It succeeded in facilitating a Democratic landslide. This can not be good for the nation. We need two viable parties.

    Sarah Palin is now the heroine of the Republican base. Scary. During the campaign it became obvious that she is completely ignorant on the principal issues. It never became widely known that she is a religious nut: she believes in the imminent End of Days and the “Rapture,” in which the saved will be suddenly wooshed up to heaven—a notion that has no basis in scripture or anything else. She believes she was elected governor because of a laying-on-of-hands by an African clergyman who had run a witch out of town for causing automobile accidents.

    "This stuff makes William Jennings Bryan look like Martin Heidegger. I think the recent electoral disaster will energize reasonable Republicans to form a caucus with the party. Eisenhower was a prudential, common sense Republican, who loathed extremism and arrogant ignorance. He knew the New Deal could not be repealed. He once said that Senator William Knowland “tested the limits of human stupidity.” Despite Watergate, Nixon was a successful center-right president, and first-rate on foreign policy. Reagan too was a successful center-right president. It is no accident that in the election, Julie Nixon Eisenhower and David Eisenhower supported Obama.

    "In its embrace of the religious right under George W. Bush, the Republican Party became the stupid party. And committing suicide along with it has been the conservative movement. The party united around god, guns and gays is finished."

    ReplyDelete
  45. http://zogsnightmare.com/smf/index.php

    ReplyDelete
  46. Obama Selects Jewish Terrorist Emanuel As Chief Of WH Staff

    News article announcing this:
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081105/ap_on_el_pr/obama

    Let us take a serious look at who Rahm is:
    http://www.erichufschmid.net/TFC/Bollyn-Emanuel.html

    Obama sure is showing his true colors quickly isn't he?

    ReplyDelete
  47. You should have some cheese with your whine, bitch. Learn to live with it or get the hell out.

    ReplyDelete
  48. You should think up a different joke. It's pretty stale, sheisskopf.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Forget the Honeymoon
    Getting down to bizness with Obama
    by Justin Raimondo

    When I hear talk of a "honeymoon" for the President-elect – to last as long as six months, by some accounts – I think: "Fine. You lay off, and I'll do the same." But oh no, it doesn't work that way. Obama has already started in on us, and he hasn't even taken the oath of office yet. I'm talking about his appointments, starting with Rahm Emanuel as his chief of staff.

    Hey, I thought we were gong to be treated to a bipartisan approach by the Obama administration, that he was going to "reach across the aisle" – what happened to that? Señor Emanuel is known as a street-fightin' Democrat, and that's understating it. A Rolling Stone profile of Emanuel had this to say:

    "There's the story of how, the night after Clinton was elected, Emanuel was so angry at the president's enemies that he stood up at a celebratory dinner with colleagues from the campaign, grabbed a steak knife and began rattling off a list of betrayers, shouting 'Dead! . . . Dead! . . . Dead!' and plunging the knife into the table after every name. 'When he was done, the table looked like a lunar landscape,' one campaign veteran recalls. 'It was like something out of The Godfather.'"

    He's mean, he's ultra-partisan, and he's a fully-paid up member in good standing of the War Party: during the Democratic primaries in 2006, when Emanuel headed up the Dems' congressional operation, he backed pro-war candidates over antiwar Democrats every time. As Bill Safire put it on "Meet the Press" just before Tim Russert died:

    "What about Rahm Emanuel [for Vice President], the most powerful voice in the House of Representatives that agrees with Hillary Clinton on foreign affairs? He's a hawk. And although he's a rootin' tootin' liberal on domestic affairs, he is a hawk on foreign affairs. I was at the – a roast for him for Epilepsy Association, and Hillary Clinton was there, and I said, quite frankly, here you have the hawkish side of the Democratic Party. If they get together, the bumper sticker will read 'Invade and bomb with Hillary and Rahm.'"

    When the House Democratic majority passed a military appropriations bill slated for Iraq, a clause that would have prohibited an attack on Iran without a vote in Congress was deleted at the instigation of Emanuel and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. When Rep. John Murtha presaged the popular rebellion against the Iraq war by coming out against it in no uncertain terms, Emanuel urged Pelosi to refrain from endorsing his call for withdrawal, arguing that it would hurt the Democrats politically.

    With the smiling face of Don Obama serving as a front for the knife-wielding Emanuel and his "legendary intensity" – as Rolling Stone writer Joshua Green puts it – one has to wonder: what (or who) else does the Prez-elect have in store for us?

    The answer is: Jane Harman – as head of the CIA! (If she doesn't get it, not to worry: she's also up for head of Homeland Security – and if she doesn't get that, she's on the short list for National Intelligence czarina).

    Will somebody go see if Glenn Greenwald is okay? I fear he may have done something drastic, especially after all that gushing he's done over the Dear Leader.

    Harman has always taken the side of the Bushies when it comes to eavesdropping: during Gen Michael Hayden's confirmation hearings for CIA director, she was against making government eavesdropping an issue. When the New York Times revealed the illegal eavesdropping program authorized by Bush, she was outraged – at the Times, which she strongly hinted ought to be prosecuted. She was pro-war, and did her part in spreading the "bad intel" she now claims to have been fooled by – declaring not only that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, but also purveying the rather far-out notion that al-Qaeda had taken up residence there prior to the US invasion.

    Harman's ambition is matched only by her recklessness: she came up against the FBI, in 2006, when she was investigated for going a little too far in her aggressive campaign to retain her seat as head of the House Intelligence Committee. Apparently she had AIPAC officials and major Democratic donors personally lobby Pelosi, in return for the promise that she, Harman, would intercede on behalf of Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman, two top AIPAC officials currently being prosecuted for stealing US top secret intelligence and passing it on to Israeli officials. Law enforcement officials aver hard evidence for this quid pro quo was never uncovered. I'm hoping, however, that some Republican back-bencher has the balls to bring it up at her confirmation hearing. Perhaps they could call Pelosi as a witness.

    Combined with the foreign policy views of Dennis Ross, Obama's senior advisor for Middle East affairs – who is reportedly up for the National Security Advisor slot – what seems to be shaping up is a perfect trifecta of trouble on the horizon. The old adage that presidents rarely govern in synch with the way they campaign applies here, and in spades. Change? Not in the foreign policy realm, buster. Indeed, if any change is involved, it may well be for the worse.

    By the time Obama is through making his appointments, all those Hollywood liberals over at the HuffPuffPost will be huffing and puffing with outrage: and, in true Hollywood style, they'll be screaming: "Forget the honeymoon – I want a divorce!"

    But it will be too late for that. The Big O marches on, with all sorts of plans for our future, including perhaps "national service," and – for sure – a significant ratcheting-up of the war in Afghanistan. In the meantime, Iran continues to loom large as an issue.

    Just as Obama was claiming his victory, the Iranians were warning us to stay away from their airspace – there have apparently been a number of close calls recently. Also, the Russians announced they were putting missiles near their border with Poland, to counter the sophisticated anti-missile "defense" systems put in place by the US and its Eastern European ally. Adding insult to injury, the official explanation for the US deployment is that the anti-missile system is there to guard against an Iranian attack. Whether the Obama-ites buy into this sort of malarkey or not isn't clear. What is all too obvious, however, is that President Obama will continue the West's war of words – and "soft power" – against the Russians, a prospect that bodes ill for the cause of peace.

    So, you thought you were turning over a whole new leaf for the country when you marked your ballot for the Dear Leader – didn't you? Well, surprise – surprise!

    ~ Justin Raimondo

    ReplyDelete
  50. Obama’s American Dream: Servitude

    Kurt Nimmo
    November 7, 2008

    “When you choose to serve — whether it’s your nation, your community or simply your neighborhood — you are connected to that fundamental American ideal that we want life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness not just for ourselves, but for all Americans. That’s why it’s called the American dream,” declares Obama on the newly fashioned Office of the President-Elect website.




    Charlie Rangle has authored a bill that may be dusted off after Obama enters the Oval Office. It’s called the National Service Act and calls for a universal draft with two years of “service” for virtually all persons aged 18-42, with no deferment for college.

    Obama’s vision of the American dream, however, will not consist of Americans freely choosing to volunteer to work in their communities and neighborhoods. It will be a requirement. “Obama will call on citizens of all ages to serve America, by developing a plan to require 50 hours of community service in middle school and high school and 100 hours of community service in college every year.” (Emphasis added.)

    And it will not simply be the young who will be “called” by government mandate to serve. It will be everybody, including senior citizens. “Obama will encourage retiring Americans to serve by improving programs available for individuals over age 55, while at the same time promoting youth programs such as Youth Build and Head Start.” The words “call” and “require” appear to be interchangeable in this context.

    As the Albuquerque Examiner mentioned yesterday, Obama’s chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, wants compulsory service imposed on eighteen and twenty-five year old Americans. “They’ll be asked to report for three months of basic civil defense training in their state or community,” writes Emanuel in his book, The Plan: Big Ideas for America. “These young people will be available to address their communities’ most pressing needs.”



    It now appears Emanuel’s version of mandatory servitude, masquerading as patriotism, will not be limited to the young but will be imposed on all Americans, including retirees.

    In July, Obama revealed his plan for “a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as the U.S. military. In the speech, Obama said “People of all ages, stations, and skills will be asked to serve.” He also said this mass movement requiring servitude “will be a central cause of my presidency.”

    Charlie Rangle has authored a bill that may be dusted off after Obama enters the Oval Office. It’s called the National Service Act and calls for a universal draft with two years of “service” for virtually all persons aged 18-42, with no deferment for college. The language of Rangel’s bill states that “all persons in the United States between the ages of 18 and 42″ be required to “perform national service, either as a member of the uniformed services or in civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security.”

    In the months ahead, we can expect “public service,” i.e., compulsory servitude, to be a mantelpiece of the Obama regime. It will be necessary because Obama will undoubtedly soon have no shortage of enemies — that is to say, people opposed to his policies — and a national Stasi framework, under the rubric of a “civilian national security force,” will be required to ferret out enemies of the state. In addition, “carbon criminals” will need to be identified and rounded up and shipped off to re-education and forced labor camps.

    Considering the emotional zeal of Obama’s kool aid drinkers — frighteningly on display as Obama swept the election — there will likely to be no shortage of recruits to enthusiastically enforce his decrees, actually decrees passed down by the globalist New World Order.

    In a historical sense, this is fascism on steroids.

    ReplyDelete
  51. ANSWP twink Phil Anderson works in the mailroom at Oracle in Peoria Illinois. We should get him fired. :)

    ReplyDelete
  52. Ahhhh the sound of so called WN and right wingers whining. Yes something is right in the Universe when that happens. It gives me a warm fuzzy feeling deep inside.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Another joke? I don't think so bitch, I am going to remind you over and over and over for at least 4 years, boys.

    ReplyDelete
  54. So you got a shitskin in office, big fucking deal. Washington has been packing the government with shits for 40 years now. They my as well have a turd-colored beast running the sewer also!

    ReplyDelete
  55. I guess the multicult isn't always so stable:

    Gays Lash Out At Blacks Over Gay Marriage Ban

    After 70% of blacks supported Proposition 8 in California, radical gay mobs are attacking blacks at their protests.

    Pam's House Blend reported:


    Geoffrey, a student at UCLA and regular Rod 2.0 reader, joined the massive protest outside the Temple of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Westwood. Geoffrey was called the n-word at least twice.


    It was like being at a klan rally except the klansmen were wearing Abercrombie polos and Birkenstocks.

    YOU N*GGER, one man shouted at men. If your people want to call me a F*GGOT, I will call you a n*gger. Someone else said same thing to me on the next block near the temple...me and my friend were walking, he is also gay but Korean, and a young WeHo clone said after last night the n*ggers better not come to West Hollywood if they knew what was BEST for them.

    ReplyDelete
  56. whine whine whine. Obama is still pres and you are still stupid.

    ReplyDelete
  57. The night we waved goodbye to America... our last best hope on Earth

    By

    Peter Hitchens

    Anyone would think we had just elected a hip, skinny and youthful replacement for God, with a plan to modernise Heaven and Hell – or that at the very least John Lennon had come back from the dead.
    The swooning frenzy over the choice of Barack Obama as President of the United States must be one of the most absurd waves of self-deception and swirling fantasy ever to sweep through an advanced civilisation. At least Mandela-worship – its nearest equivalent – is focused on a man who actually did something.
    I really don’t see how the Obama devotees can ever in future mock the Moonies, the Scientologists or people who claim to have been abducted in flying saucers. This is a cult like the one which grew up around Princess Diana, bereft of reason and hostile to facts.
    Scroll down for more

    The night America changed: Barack and Michelle Obama in Chicago.
    It already has all the signs of such a thing. The newspapers which recorded Obama’s victory have become valuable relics. You may buy Obama picture books and Obama calendars and if there isn’t yet a children’s picture version of his story, there soon will be.
    Proper books, recording his sordid associates, his cowardly voting record, his astonishingly militant commitment to unrestricted abortion and his blundering trip to Africa, are little-read and hard to find.
    If you can believe that this undistinguished and conventionally Left-wing machine politician is a sort of secular saviour, then you can believe anything. He plainly doesn’t believe it himself. His cliche-stuffed, PC clunker of an acceptance speech suffered badly from nerves. It was what you would expect from someone who knew he’d promised too much and that from now on the easy bit was over.
    He needn’t worry too much. From now on, the rough boys and girls of America’s Democratic Party apparatus, many recycled from Bill Clinton’s stained and crumpled entourage, will crowd round him, to collect the rich spoils of his victory and also tell him what to do, which is what he is used to.
    Just look at his sermon by the shores of Lake Michigan. He really did talk about a ‘new dawn’, and a ‘timeless creed’ (which was ‘yes, we can’). He proclaimed that ‘change has come’. He revealed that, despite having edited the Harvard Law Review, he doesn’t know what ‘enormity’ means. He reached depths of oratorical drivel never even plumbed by our own Mr Blair, burbling about putting our hands on the arc of history (or was it the ark of history?) and bending it once more toward the hope of a better day (Don’t try this at home).
    I am not making this up. No wonder that awful old hack Jesse Jackson sobbed as he watched. How he must wish he, too, could get away with this sort of stuff.
    And it was interesting how the President-elect failed to lift his admiring audience by repeated – but rather hesitant – invocations of the brainless slogan he was forced by his minders to adopt against his will – ‘Yes, we can’. They were supposed to thunder ‘Yes, we can!’ back at him, but they just wouldn’t join in. No wonder. Yes we can what exactly? Go home and keep a close eye on the tax rate, is my advice. He’d have been better off bursting into ‘I’d like to teach the world to sing in perfect harmony’ which contains roughly the same message and might have attracted some valuable commercial sponsorship.
    Perhaps, being a Chicago crowd, they knew some of the things that 52.5 per cent of America prefers not to know. They know Obama is the obedient servant of one of the most squalid and unshakeable political machines in America. They know that one of his alarmingly close associates, a state-subsidised slum landlord called Tony Rezko, has been convicted on fraud and corruption charges.
    They also know the US is just as segregated as it was before Martin Luther King – in schools, streets, neighbourhoods, holidays, even in its TV-watching habits and its choice of fast-food joint. The difference is that it is now done by unspoken agreement rather than by law.
    If Mr Obama’s election had threatened any of that, his feel-good white supporters would have scuttled off and voted for John McCain, or practically anyone. But it doesn’t. Mr Obama, thanks mainly to the now-departed grandmother he alternately praised as a saint and denounced as a racial bigot, has the huge advantages of an expensive private education. He did not have to grow up in the badlands of useless schools, shattered families and gangs which are the lot of so many young black men of his generation.
    If the nonsensical claims made for this election were true, then every positive discrimination programme aimed at helping black people into jobs they otherwise wouldn’t get should be abandoned forthwith. Nothing of the kind will happen. On the contrary, there will probably be more of them.
    And if those who voted for Obama were all proving their anti-racist nobility, that presumably means that those many millions who didn’t vote for him were proving themselves to be hopeless bigots. This is obviously untrue.

    Yes we can what?: Barack Obama ran on the ticket of change
    I was in Washington DC the night of the election. America’s beautiful capital has a sad secret. It is perhaps the most racially divided city in the world, with 15th Street – which runs due north from the White House – the unofficial frontier between black and white. But, like so much of America, it also now has a new division, and one which is in many ways much more important. I had attended an election-night party in a smart and liberal white area, but was staying the night less than a mile away on the edge of a suburb where Spanish is spoken as much as English, plus a smattering of tongues from such places as Ethiopia, Somalia and Afghanistan.
    As I walked, I crossed another of Washington’s secret frontiers. There had been a few white people blowing car horns and shouting, as the result became clear. But among the Mexicans, Salvadorans and the other Third World nationalities, there was something like ecstasy.
    They grasped the real significance of this moment. They knew it meant that America had finally switched sides in a global cultural war. Forget the Cold War, or even the Iraq War. The United States, having for the most part a deeply conservative people, had until now just about stood out against many of the mistakes which have ruined so much of the rest of the world.
    Suspicious of welfare addiction, feeble justice and high taxes, totally committed to preserving its own national sovereignty, unabashedly Christian in a world part secular and part Muslim, suspicious of the Great Global Warming panic, it was unique.
    These strengths had been fading for some time, mainly due to poorly controlled mass immigration and to the march of political correctness. They had also been weakened by the failure of America’s conservative party – the Republicans – to fight on the cultural and moral fronts.
    They preferred to posture on the world stage. Scared of confronting Left-wing teachers and sexual revolutionaries at home, they could order soldiers to be brave on their behalf in far-off deserts. And now the US, like Britain before it, has begun the long slow descent into the Third World. How sad. Where now is our last best hope on Earth?

    Here

    ReplyDelete
  58. What an idiot, this country was already dead before it elected a nigger!

    ReplyDelete
  59. Ahhhh listen to the right wing, white trash punk whine. Oh man, that gives me a stiffy to hear them so unhappy. LOL

    ReplyDelete
  60. Do you people really think a man with 143 days in the U.S. Senate when he started his campaign is actually going to BE the President?

    Oh, he may be propped forward as the President just like Dmitri Medvedev in Russia, but why do you think he chose Delaware Senator-for-Life Joe Biden as his running mate? Biden will be running the country behind the scenes, just like Dick Cheney did for Dubya and like Vladimir Putin is doing in Russia.

    That's the new trend in the civilized world - Number 2 is actually Number 1. Only in Third World countries like Venezuela and North Korea is Number 1 actually Number 1.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Enjoy your black Stalin. :)

    ReplyDelete
  62. YES WE CAN! Obama is President-elect retard. Only Republicans like Ronnie
    Raygun are too damn stupid to be president!

    OBAMA WINS OBAMA WINS OH YESSS LIBERALS IN CHARGE. LIVE WITH IT WN PUNKS. OH YESSSSSSSS

    ReplyDelete
  63. Anyone heard the rumor that Von has Prostrate cancer? Oh man, this is almost as good as Bill going to prison. I hope that Von gets a Jewish doctor.

    ReplyDelete
  64. A violation of civil rights because they are European Americans. Plain and simple as that.


    With great concern European Americans United has been closely watching recent events unfold in Memphis Tennessee regarding a planned conference by EURO, a white American civil rights group led by former state representative Dr. David Duke, and the un-American fascist manner this event was nearly shut down. Following threats of violence against several hotels booked to host the meeting-- by so-called anti racists and civil rights advocates-- numerous innocent people who had made great sacrifices to attend the EURO conference may have lost not only their paid room reservations but costs such as airline tickets once they were notified the conference was rescheduled.

    Upon learning of the scheduled EURO Conference at the Whispering Woods Convention Center, radicals threatened to bomb the hotel. The manager, as well as the lives of his wife and children was threatened. After these terrorist threats, the county Sheriff declared an official State of Emergency and the hotel canceled the hundred reserved rooms and the meeting facilities of the EURO conference were canceled just four days before the event. This was, of course, after many had bought non-refundable plane tickets and the organization had a significant financial outlay for speakers... more




    Fortunately, this planned event did successfully take place; but not after great effort by the sponsors of this conference. Nevertheless the local constabulary initially groveled to politically correct dogma. When word of the conference drew terrorist threats from local/regional sources they went so far as to declare a state of emergency! Of course the media appeared to side with those who wanted the EURO conference shut down. So as far as we should be concerned the local media, law enforcement and craven hoteliers appeared to be in league with some of the worst elements society has to offer.

    And herein is the center of EUROs civil rights violation: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    Civil rights may refer to several different things:

    Civil and political rights are a class of rights ensuring things such as the protection of peoples' physical integrity; procedural fairness in law; protection from discrimination based on gender, religion, race, sexual orientation, etc; individual freedom of belief, speech, association, and the press; and political participation.
    While a growing number of people are becoming aware that things are not right with America we at EAU can safely say this entire debacle was a civil rights issue, plain and simple. That a small band of miscreants and anti-white bigots, including local government functionaries in DeSoto County Tennessee --as well as the media-- could actually block a peaceful gathering of ethnically cognizant European Americans from holding a free association of persons is reminiscent of Stalinist Russia. As far as a violation of the civil rights of EURO participants goes, members of other races, after all, make it a point to show favoritism towards their own kind regardless of the situation, political correctness be damned. Free inquiry and the ability for reasonable people of all races and backgrounds to reasonably differ -- or for people to see both sides of an issue -- have been replaced by either character assassination or psycho-pathologizing dissent.

    For the record European Americans United deplores the kind of specious underhanded extremism, hate, and political correctness leveled against EURO and its participants. This could have happened to anyone regardless of their ethnicity and it is not only unacceptable, it is dangerous.

    ==

    The biased, dirty, lying Memphis Commercial Appeal Newspaper

    The following is a letter EURO received from a journalist who attended Dr. David Duke’s press conference on Thursday, November 6th.

    I am a journalist who attended Dr. David Duke’s press conference today and I was shocked by the biased newspaper article I saw on the Commercial Appeal website about it. I can’t write about it in the publication I work for because I would lose my job for simply telling the truth about this matter.

    I don’t agree with the politics of David Duke, but I consider myself a real journalist who aspires to write honestly and not bring my own prejudices to my work. I treat everyone, whether I agree with them or not with the same degree of respect and fairness. That’s why I referred to Dr. David Duke with the “Dr.” title, just as my articles on Dr. Martin Luther King refer to him with “Dr.” because that is his proper title. Dr. Duke is a PhD just as Dr. Martin Luther King was.

    The Commercial Appeal article headlined: “Duke says white power conference set for new location.” In actual fact, Dr. Duke does not and has never used the slogan, “White Power.” The first thing Dr. Duke did at the press conference was to point out that he wasn’t a “White Power” advocate but a white civil rights advocate. He also clearly stated he was not a “white supremacist” but believed in equal rights for all “even for white people.” He contends that Whites face widespread racial discrimination in affirmative action hiring, promotions, scholarships and college admissions, and that government immigration policies will damage the long term, intrinsic interests of whites. The EURO president also said that there are thousands of groups in America that openly promote the interests of African Americans, Mexican Americans and Jewish Americans, so why shouldn’t Whites have the right to defend their rights and heritage.

    He went on to relate that his original conference with over 100 rooms rented at the Whispering Woods Hotel was canceled after threats on the life of the Hotel Manager and his wife and children, and after Desoto county declared a State of Emergency. He said that America is not free when terrorist threats can prevent Americans from exercising their rights to assemble peaceably and speak freely. One of the scheduled conference speakers, a English-fluent human rights attorney from Moscow, Russia, Masha Vallachenko, expressed her shock at the cancellation saying, “I had always believed that America was the land of the free, but now I am not so sure.”

    Reporting on the cancellation of the original meeting, the Commercial Appeal reporter wrote,

    “The European-American Unity and Rights Conference was scheduled at the Whispering Woods Hotel and Conference Center in Olive Branch, but the hotel later canceled the contract after the nature of the conference came to light and controversy soon followed.”

    No, the conference was canceled after the hotel received terroristic threats and after a State of Emergency was declared in Desoto County by the Sheriff’s Office.

    There has been no outrage by the media or by authorities at this provocation. I wonder what the Commercial Appeal would be writing if a NAACP national conference would have been canceled by White terrorist threats? The outrage would have been national if not world wide. The FBI would have certainly sent a task force down to uncover and prosecute the violators of civil rights.

    The way David Duke and his supporter’s rights have been trampled some may be forgiven for thinking that he has a good point in saying that Whites are losing their heritage and rights in America.

    Once The Drury Inn found out that the press planned to interview David Duke in his hotel room at 2 pm today, they refused to allow it. Dr. Duke honored the hotel’s request and met with the press meeting outside on public property. Later, the Drury Inn kicked Dr. Duke out of the hotel completely, saying that he couldn’t stay at the Drury Inn because the hotel had received threats. I wonder what the reaction to all this would have been if Jesse Jackson had been kicked out of the Drury Inn.

    None of this was reported by the Commercial Appeal, in fact they didn’t even mention the cause of the cancellation of Duke’s conference: terrorist threats against this organization and the hotel. America is now allowing punks who make threats to take away our most precious constitutional rights of freedom of speech and freedom of assembly. The human rights lawyer from Russia, had every right to be shocked by the fact that we are no longer the land of the free, and we Americans have every reason to be ashamed.

    Through all this, David Duke and EURO will meet somewhere in the Memphis area on Saturday and Sunday.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Antifa = Red terrorists.

    ReplyDelete
  66. The reds are the biggest hypocrites of the past two centuries. They claim to represent the working class yet their literature is seldom understood by anyone who is not of a middle class background. Most of their leaders are from privileged backgrounds, they're just rich kids with bad consciences.
    They claim to represent equality but they generated the reverse. They claimed many things and all they ever achieved was tyranny, death and turmoil.

    In truth, they represented neither the nation, nor the people, nor the working class.

    Let take a look at Russian history, a blood bath of major upheaval. They attempted to generate a fairer society and left nothing but misery for successive new generations of Russians.

    Who is it that runs the major industries of Russia today? Former Communist Party officials who sold their very ideals for 30 pieces of silver - time and time again one sees George Orwell's Animal Farm or 1984.

    No greater example can be found than in the New Labour Party in Britain today. Tony Blair is so removed from his youthful ideals that he would definitely denounce himself if he was to travel back in time.

    In the final analysis the reds are false, untruthful, degenerates and tyrants.

    The White working-class has to wake up to the hypocritical reds and seek alternatives that would represent them. That is NOW Radical White Nationalism.

    WE, AS WHITE NATIONALISTS SAY:
    NO COMPROMISE WITH THE REDS...
    NO DEALS WITH THE REDS...
    NO SURRENDER TO THE REDS!!!

    Redwatch!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  67. Obama has won. The elite and the media supported him without even knowing his agenda. It was necessary to elect Obama because of the color of his skin. Slavery, colonization and Islamophobia had to be expiated.

    A large majority of the world's population is rejoicing over this racist voting and rightly sees it as the expression of an anti-white vote. It is truly an historic day. Beginning now, our days are numbered.

    In Europe this election will encourage all the lobbies that endorse immigration as population replacement. The "white" culture will be forced to melt into a racially mixed, relativist and multicultural magma. On the other hand, the Muslim, African and Papuan cultures will be magnified.

    The day will come when this Orwellian society will collapse under the weight of its contradictions but it will be too late to re-establish our values. We have no future: now it is every man for himself and God for all. by Gerard Pince

    Let us hope and pray that Pince is just a bit too pessimistic. It is always possible that Obama will show his hand early in the game and whites who voted for him will begin to regret it...

    ReplyDelete
  68. God do so called "White Nationals" do anything but cry. Oh wait sometimes they whine. What a bunch of bitches.

    ReplyDelete
  69. BREAKING NEWS:

    Bill White's cell mates put him on a high protein diet! More as the story grows and develops.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Nikki hasn't written anything since Nov. 5th.

    I think she is getting lazy our uninterested in her own website.

    ReplyDelete
  71. They won, stupid. Now it's time for you to go get a life.

    ReplyDelete
  72. Reichsmarshal Offer

    Anyone know anything about this? Who is NSM records and why would they want to do Jim Ramm dirty?

    ReplyDelete
  73. Matthew Ramsey is not well liked by anyone in that he does not play well with others. A year or so ago Ramsey/Ramm had a falling out with the NSM, apparently they felt that Ramsey was trying to use the NSM to run a personal Vendetta against Bill White.

    John Schafer AKA REICHSMARSHAL runs NSM888records which produces racist punk rock music and sells TV shirts and other racist memorabilia. After the break up between Ramsey/NSM, Ramsey went on a smear campaign against many in the NSM including Schafer. Reportedly Schafer is more of a businessman than a Nazi believer and he was the main reason Ramsey was kicked out of the NSM. Schafer was tired of Bill suing the NSM and costing them money. Schafer has recently started calling Ramsey a snitch and claims that Ramsey is the reason both him and Justine Boyer has been indicted.

    ReplyDelete
  74. Funny that Schafer (If that is really him) would be recruiting others to do his dirty work - if you believe.

    It always amazes me that these guys talk so big but when it comes down to it they are always trying to get someone else to dirty their hands. An absolute bunch of pussies?

    ReplyDelete
  75. Yes, I have a hard time believing that Schafer would post on Nimbusters. Schafer is the money man for NSM however, he only gives Jeff Schoep a small amount of money which is supposedly for the NSM. I doubt that the NSM sees any of that money. There have been some rumors that Schafer wants to run for President under the NSM banner in 2012.

    In any case I really have a lot of trouble with Schafer, he is a turd who makes money off of hate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm looking for John Schafer long story but new him when we where young can someone please help me.

      Delete
  76. Yes Nikki, they are a bunch of pussies.

    ReplyDelete
  77. Looks like NIMbusters are taking a giant crap here.

    At least they are distracted.

    ReplyDelete
  78. Hey Nikki, does black shit taste as good as white shit?

    ReplyDelete
  79. Hey Nikki, if Obama was screwing you in the ass with his black snake, would you suck your shit off his dick after he came ? ? ?

    ReplyDelete

All comments must remain civil. No threats, racist epithets, or personal attacks will be tolerated. Rational debate, discourse, and even disagreement are all acceptable as long as they remain on point and within the realm of civility.