Sunday, May 06, 2007

COLD SHOT - May 7

In this latest Cold Shot Nicole Nichols gives her thoughts on the upcoming Knoxville rallies and demonstrations; A commentary on the current movement to make the "n-word" illegal; and some very pointed comments about the actions of Joe Bednarsky.

Don't forget the Thursday night Eye On Hate show beginning at 9:00 EST where you can call in and comment on any of the commentary.

TO THE SHOW

TO CONTACT NICOLE

33 comments:

  1. youse blonks r wasting yr time...do sumthin' use-ful with yr friggin' lives(how many yrs u rckn youse got any-way?)....like: for instance, grow organic vgtbls or sumthin'!

    get this!

    there is NO POWER on the face of this Earth that is going to STOP US!

    we are DESTINED FOR VICTORY!

    u think a bunch of low twerps like youse r gunna halt a force of Nature?

    Adolf Hitler prophesised shortly before his heroic death(which: BTW: occurred in the streets of Berlin fighting to the death against the advancing ZOG hordes, NOT in some under-ground bunker like a friggin' kike coward!) that "one day, Nazi bands will play in the streets of America and Britain!"

    "there is a new White Power arising! its victory is assured!"

    ReplyDelete
  2. What a joke - a bad one, at that.

    ReplyDelete
  3. (yawns)

    I do have to credit Jimbo for one thing: his delusional description of Hitler fighting the "advancing ZOG hordes" is one of the funniest neo-Nutsi fantasies I have heard in a long time.

    I have to admit I have never heard a neo-Nazi try to deny the historical reality of Hitler's death by cyanide capsule in a bunker underneath Berlin.

    I HAVE heard hallucinatory Hitlerphiles claim he escaped to Argentina, or that he was shot by a traitor, but the idea that the German dictator died fighting on "the streets of Berlin" is quite laughable.

    It is well-documented that the squirrely Hitler lived his last month in der F├╝hrerbunker underneath Berlin, listening to Allied bombing overhead and the sounds of Soviet troops moving closer to the crumbling center of Nazi power.

    Now, Jimbo: go take your meds and crack open a history book.

    Oh wait, I forgot: DA JOOS write all the history books, and you can only trust people like Jimbo to get the real truth out (sarcasm alert).

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ok, for some reason, my old account doesn't work on here anymore. I created a new one.

    First off, I honestly think there is no way White Nationalism can't win. Just like its mother, communism, multi-culturalism is already failing everywhere you look. It doesn't meld with the human spirit, and its in total rebellion against nature. Regardless of what tactics work and don't work for white nationalists, we're fighting a cancerous enemy who'll fall dead on its on, given time and growingly favorable conditions.

    And Mike, really. Who can't think of at least several jews one knows personally who scrambled to get their history degree and teach things their way (and not allow it any other way). Jews believe in everyone having a say and telling their side of things as much as I believe they are poor, misunderstood pacifists.

    It used to be that I'd go to National Alliance meetings to hear the whole "middle of the road racialist" point of view. Now all I have to do is open my ears at the coffee shop, market or waiting room. Common sense was going to win, people! On top of that, the anti-white/racist crowd doesn't effectively intimidate people like they once did. Face it, people aren't as afraid of you as they once were.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I just can't figure out how all DEM JOOS got into Berlin and forged all those Nazi documents to make it look like Hitler died in a bunker.

    DEM JOOS are pretty crafty, I must say, especially faking those hundreds of thousands of documents to make it look like the poor, misunderstood Nazis committed genocide (sarcasm alert again).

    Hey, WNs - on a related topic - walking around wearing T-shirts that say things like "SIX MILLION MORE" only makes it look like you believe the Holocaust that you try so hard to deny.


    Or could it be that you adopt a Holocaust denial stance just to stir up controversy, just to screw with DA JOOS you hate so much?

    Finally, with regard to WN claims of "destiny": My true concerns about the racist attempts to stir up trouble mostly revolve around the innocent people who get hurt in the aftermath of your delusional "movement."

    If you were serious about your "ideals" of white separatism, you would be buying up a couple of hundred acres in Idaho and having an Aryan love-fest with your inbred volk. Instead, WNs decide they are the self-appointed arbiters of hate-mongering - and the vanguard leading a would-be "racial warfare" - for the 99.9% of Americans who simply want to get along with their neighbors, irrespective of color.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hitler could have been like the Kaiser in WWI and fled for Sweden, which figured prominently in Hitler’s decision to stay.

    Hitler could have left Berlin before it was encircled. He chose to stay on the stage of world history when the curtain fell.

    I am fairly up on the history of this and most accounts say he shot himself in the mouth with a small caliber pistol. Some accounts have him taking a capsule and simultaneously shooting himself.

    I don't see it as a cowardly act at all. I don't think he wanted the Soviets to have his body to be displayed as a trophy. Like I said before he could have fled Berlin to prepared guerilla positions surrounding Berchesgaden (Which Eisenhower incorrectly thought Hitler would do and probably why they let the Soviets have Berlin).

    ReplyDelete
  7. 'historymike': u see, the dffrnc between u & me, MATE, is that I DON'T BELIEVE EVERY-THING THAT'S SPEWED OUTTA THE MSM!....or, for that matter, ZOG establishment historians!

    WTF do u get yr info' on WWII from?

    the Discovery chnnl?

    let me ask you this: if some historian or academic @ a major university started publicly questioning the 'officially approved' vrsn of WWII, how long do u rckn he or she would last?

    hunh?

    there's a HUGE AMOUNT of material been released since the fall of the USSR that, conveniently, has not made its way into the 'accepted' texts!

    until that material had been released and meticulously examined, main-stream western historians HAD NO FCKN BUSINESS! making categorical statements abt stuff like the Holocaust: most of which, even if you accept the 'official account', occurred well beyond the pur-view of the US & the UK!

    the USSR was the first into Berlin in April/May 1945: NOT THE US or THE UK!...hence: we basically hafta rely on bogus commie propaganda as to Hitler's actual fate!

    the accnt of Hitler's demise comes from the Dresdner Zeitung of May 2nd 1945...it is cited in Irving's Hitler's War

    ReplyDelete
  8. Ah, yes - David Irving; now THERE'S an authoritative source. The man never completed a college degree, and his work has been roundly dismissed by everyone except the handful of deniers who keep full the coffers of the IHR.

    Maybe Irving should raise up some cash, bribe the officials at Ukraine's MAUP university, and get a history PhD, like David Duke. At least he'd then be "Dr. David Irving."

    Interesting, too, that you rail against the Soviets, yet you hold onto hope that somewhere in the vast archives of the former USSR is the key to the "real" truth about the final days of Hitler.

    At least Vonbluvens has the intellectual honesty to acknowledge that Hitler took his own life in the bunker. Why is that so hard for you to deal with?

    One would expect that a national leader, during times of crisis, has a secure and defensible place from which to lead. Heck, even Cheney had enough brains to "bunker down" after 9/11.

    If I were Hitler, I too probably would have blown my brains out (or taken the cyanide pill) rather than become a Soviet prisoner, or to be tortured to death in Berlin.

    Nice try with the ad hominem attacks on my history credentials, though. No, I develop my knowledge from the primary source documents and by reading secondary texts.

    Oh wait, I forgot - DA JOOS write all of them! (Sarcasm alert)

    ReplyDelete
  9. (forgot to answer a Jimbo question)

    As far as the amount of time someone would last in a university setting spouting denial rhetoric, that would depend on the circumstances.

    Electrical engineer Arthur Butz has been an active Holocaust denier since 1977 at Northwestern, despite his colleagues' efforts to censure him. Tenure works both ways.

    But if one were to try to obtain employment in ANY discipline proclaiming utter nonsense (the Earth is flat, the Holocaust is a hoax, the moonlanding was faked), the road would be difficult.

    There are thousands of legitimate historians who work on the Holocaust, and there are areas in which historians disagree (such as the intentionalism versus functionalism debate).

    Historians regularly question the past, and turning a skeptical eye toward individual documents is part of the work of historians. Only fools, though, claim that the Holocaust never occurred.

    BTW - regarding David Irving and other denial prophets: you seem willing to accept the writings of people untrained as historians. Do you also visit medical practitioners who have never been trained as doctors? Would you get dental work done by some person working out of her house who claims to know dentistry? Do you take your car to a certified mechanic, or to the house of some guy you met at a bar?

    Me? I rely on people with expertise, people who have completed the standard field of study for their work.

    ReplyDelete
  10. 'historymike': "Ah, yes - David Irving; now THERE'S an authoritative source. The man never completed a college degree, and his work has been roundly dismissed by everyone except the handful of deniers who keep full the coffers of the IHR"

    nvr completed a college degree?
    WTF does it say you have to 'complete a college degree' to re-hash jew bull-shit?
    but: of course: by yr criteria: 'not having completed a college degree' would also rule out the likes of Herodotus & Edward Gibbon....oh: perhaps Shakespeare shouldn't have bothered penning any plays or sonnets becasue 'he never completed a college degree'?
    (ohh...and, BTW, i don't base my rejection of the BULLSHIT WWII fairy tale wholly & solely on Irving....but others also: like: as you hv mentioned: Butz, Faurisson, Zundel and Rudolf)

    "Maybe Irving should raise up some cash, bribe the officials at Ukraine's MAUP university and get a history PhD, like David Duke. At least he'd then be 'Dr David Irving'"

    maybe he should...eh?
    but: could such a degree be of any less worth than those 'affirmative action degrees' handed out to niggaz evn in some Ivy League colleges?

    "Nice try with the ad hominem attacks on my history credentials, though. No, I develop my knowledge from the primary source documents and by reading secondary texts"

    i doubt it...if you did: you wouldn't be so ready to jump in 'boots & all' to defend an event for which the evidence is dubious @ best!

    "But if one were to try to obtain employment in ANY discipline proclaiming utter nonsense (the Earth is flat, the Holocaust is a hoax, the moonlanding was faked), the road would be difficult"

    just if you denied the Holocaust...i think you'll find that there are all sorts of academics espousing all sorts of ridiculous notions....and don't try yr 'straw man' bull-shit by putting Holocaust denial in the same bucket as flat Earthers...the Holocaust is a dubious event relying almost wholly & solely on 'eye-witness testimony': the least reliable of all forms of evidence: there is NO WAY IN HELL that any-thing associated with it can be 'jacked up' to the level of proof that could be advanced to establish that the Earth is spherical-shaped!
    so: don't try THAT ONE on, pal!

    "There are thousands of legitimate historians who work on the Holocaust, and there are areas in which historians disagree (such as the intentionalism versus functionalism debate)"

    those are minor quibling details; you'll nvr get any MS-'historian' to tackle the really 'meaty issues' like, for instance: i/crematoria operation c1945 technology; ii/population distributions of the jews in Eastern Europe; iii/the actual chemical properties and function of Zyklon B; iv/the construction and architecture of so-called 'gas chambers' and v/the actual veracity & provenance of any photographic evidence claiming to substantiate the Holocaust;
    (thatz only a short list: there r many more 'meaty issues' of course!)

    "Historians regularly question the past, and turning a skeptical eye toward individual documents is part of the work of historians. Only fools, though, claim that the Holocaust never occurred"

    historians only question the past within approved limits: Holocaust Orthodoxy is one such limit!
    but: check yr circular reasoning: only fools claim the Holocaust never occurred, therefore 'historians' would not question it?
    get it?
    that's called an un-substantiated philosphical pre-supposition!

    "BTW - regarding David Irving and other denial prophets: you seem willing to accept the writings of people untrained as historians. Do you also visit medical practitioners who have never been trained as doctors? Would you get dental work done by some person working out of her house who claims to know dentistry? Do you take your car to a certified mechanic, or to the house of some guy you met at a bar?"

    WTF is the 'ad hominem' artist now, eh, champ?
    medicine and dentistry ARE NOT the same disciplines as 'historian'
    ANY ONE can be an historian: even YOU!
    how-ever: NO un-trained person can hang their shingle as a GP or a dentist!
    LIVES don't depend on whthr or not an historian is 'un-trained'!

    "Me? I rely on people with expertise, people who have completed the standard field of study for their work"
    what-ever!
    you don't need to 'complete a standard field of study' to be an historian: a person with professional qualifications like Arthur Butz or Germar Rudolf can do the job just as well with a certain amnt of practice!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Mike, what amazes me is the persecution of the so-called deniers.

    Before Irving's "denier" status he was considered the preeminent historian of the Third Reich. Funny how politics changed his status.

    No, I don't believe the official account of the Holocaust (I use to). When people are rounded up and placed in jail for questioning this then in my mind there is something rotten in Denmark.

    No truth has to be backed up with intimidation and threat of incarceration.

    Jimbo is right about Soviet archives. The Soviets were masters at blaming the Germans for the evil they themselves were engaged in. A lot of material is coming to light.

    One of the interesting Soviet document discoveries was the fact that over 5 thousand American citizens fought for the Third Reich on the Eastern Front. Very interesting stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  12. von B: "One of the interesting Soviet document discoveries was the fact that over 5 thousand American citizens fought for the Third Reich on the Eastern Front. Very interesting stuff"

    there was much more support for Hitler in the US than in Britain, which had been 'jewed out' long before; perhaps evn as far back as Oliver Cromwell's time with the establishment of the jew-controlled 'Bank of England'... evn Oswald Mosley caved in to the jew war-mongers! William Joyce & a small hand-ful of other 'Brits of note' were the only honest men to be found back then in that fckn nest of vipers!

    if it wasn't for Pearl Harbour, then the US would NEVER have become involved in the Euopean theatre; FDR wouldn't have DARED to go to war on any less a pre-text: he would have been obliterated @ the ballot box: the actual anti-war movement in the US was massive; re: Elisabeth Dilling & others!

    (wonder if those Yanks were WaffenSS...?....which mostly had recruits from all over Europe!
    DeGrelle, for instance, was a Belgian, i believe)

    ReplyDelete
  13. Well, we agree on something, at least, Vonnie: I think laws against Holocaust denial are counter-productive, and only serve to make martyrs out of crappy historians.

    David Irving, Robert Faurisson, and every other denial crank should be free to spout off whatever inanity they wish, provided they are not infringing on the rights of another person (i.e., screaming in synagogues or harassing elderly concentration camp survivors).

    I suspect that in 50 years the "controversy" over Holocaust denial will be viewed much differently, as the last of the children of survivors have passed away. When there are no longer people with a direct personal connection to places like Auschwitz, the pressure to punish deniers will dissipate.

    How many people today, for example, get very agitated about the 1821-22 Chios massacre? Beyond a few geeky historians like me this event is a distant memory (if they even have one) for most people.

    Part of the reason for the anti-denial laws has been advocacy by survivor groups, who are insulted by what they see as an affront to their experiences.

    Switching topics:

    1. I fail to understand why many neo-fascist groups continue to embrace Holocaust denial. While I find this political philosophy abhorrent, I have greater intellectual respect for those who argue something like "Hitler didn't kill ENOUGH Jews." At least they are upfront about their beliefs about Judaism.

    2. On a related note: a fascist political movement that did not cloak itself in Nazi worship would likely be an easier sell to a general public that has such deep disgust with Hitler and his deeds. I would bet that the first neo-fascist group to disavow Hitler would be a formidable power. Yet, year after year groups like the NSM and ANSWP wave the swastika and shout "sieg heil" at rallies, seemingly oblivious that most people find such shennanigans to border on the lunatic.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Here's a neutral point from a very unneutral source (me):

    The reason you aren't allowed to question the jewish side of the story on the holocaust is that if you do, it might "happen" again somehow. I think thats pretty dead on when it comes to making excuses on why you need laws in place to protect the "truth."

    Here's whats funny about it. No matter how you feel about your own race or anyone else's, we can all agree that we Americans took much of the land we live on from the Indians (lots of tribes and nations summed up in that term). We killed lots of them and took their land in a military action, same as the jews have been doing for decades in the middle east. The conquest of North America lasted a lot longer than World War 2 and I'm sure a lot more people died. Agreed?

    Ok, how many then? How many Indians were killed, either in military actions, through primitive germ warfare or starvation? I don't particularly care for Indians for a variety of reasons but they are by far and away much more honorable people than jews. At least Indians fight their enemies like men instead of hiding behind others and proping up abstract mental constructs like "equality" to justify their actions. So how many of them died? How many were killed and how? Can I investigate? Can I, a non-Indians, go dig up a battlefield or a razed Indian village? Sure I can. I can get a college degree in doing it!

    And if not questioning the holoco$t is supposed to prevent people from ever letting it "happen" again, then why is the same thing that was supposedly was done to the jews, being done in Palistine? Do jews sometimes "forget" the "holocaust" too? How can they enforce laws that they don't even begin to follow?

    I'll tell you. Its simple. They preach equality to people like you all day and would never dream of even considering themselves equal to non-jews. Does this bother me personally? I bothers me less than the plight of the American Indian.

    On the subject of Indians, I really see whites as repeating all the mistakes the indians made so long ago but in a bigger way. First, whites sell each other out constantly for alien wishes (WW2, great example). Indian cheifs would constantly side with whites over rival tribes. Bad moves. Next, Indians would give away nearly everything for a few trickets and extra possesions. This sounds very familiar. Indians did then and do now, sell out their culture at the drop of a hat.

    On the other hand, many, many Indians died in battle, defending their land and their way of life. Most of what you have out there now are the bloodline-weaklings who surrendered or stabbed another tribe in the back. Frankly, I would rather see my bloodline parish from the earth than see it mixed, enslaved and exploited by some alien race. Let's hope we either win or all die out with dignity instead of going the way of this land's previous owners.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Just as a footnote, I never set out to write so much on here. I only plan on a paragraph or two. I'm not trying to be an asshole but really, I can't help myself. I love to write.

    ReplyDelete
  16. chris drake: "On the subject of Indians, I really see whites as repeating all the mistakes the indians made so long ago but in a bigger way. First, whites sell each other out constantly for alien wishes (WW2, great example). Indian cheifs would constantly side with whites over rival tribes. Bad moves. Next, Indians would give away nearly everything for a few trickets and extra possesions. This sounds very familiar. Indians did then and do now, sell out their culture at the drop of a hat"

    an interesting, albeit disturbing, analogy;

    just as with the Australian abrgnls, dffrnt tribes of Injuns were more hostile to each other than they were to white ppl!

    so much for 'an Indian resistance'!

    and so much for 'invading a continent': there was no general Indian government, just as there was no general Australian abrgnl government: just a collection of nomadic, warring tribes!

    and, of course, there is significant evidence that, in both continents, white ppl may well have settled there long before the Amerinids or abrgnls did so in any significant n°s any-way!

    re: the jews: would they survive w/out a white host?

    wht could replace us?

    Asians?

    both the Japanese and the Koreans r 'jew-wise'!

    i dunno abt the Chinese: but you can't 'infiltrate' a nation/continent of that size over-night!

    it took the yoos generations to under-mine Western civilisation....i think my-self that they are running out of time and they know it!

    the white ppl that 'invaded' North America, how-ever, didn't need the Indians to survive!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Kudos to Joseph V. Bednarsky!

    I agree with Joe's views as far as the "anti-hate" movement is no better than the "hate" movement...

    ReplyDelete
  18. In contrast, the Indians themselves stole land from whites apparently, long before the larger white invasion came about. That is another story that needs investigating.

    Oddly, I was reading a book not long ago called "Collapse." As far as I know, it was written by a jew but I could be wrong. In any case, he went on and on at two different points in the book at how reluctant anyone was to report on anything negative concerning ancient non-white cultures. I believe this sort of attitude keeps tales like the holoco$t alive as well as frowns upon the investigation of things like whites living in North America prior to 1492. Fort Mountain in Georgia is a great example of something important being brushed aside because it might paint non-whites with a brush they use on us so often.

    What anyone can see about the holoco$t is that it is protected from investigation for obvious reasons. Its a flimsy's made sweater with a long string hanging off it. You give it a good yank and the whole thing will come apart. In fact, jewish power and econmic domination of the world might suffer a major setback. They know that, as well as most everyone involved. Now in the age of information, this won't be treated as just another jewish scam like so many they have put the world through over the years.

    In fact, I see the whole thing starting to come apart now. Aside from a volunteer-jewish-mouthpiece or two, most people either no longer care what happened in the 40's to the now would-be masters of the world or don't believe much of anything happened at all to them.

    After this sham is fully exposed, people need to be made aware of all the jewish crimes against Germany and other white nations leading up to the war. After that, they need to be educated on the jewish attrocities after the war, both in Europe and Eurasia.

    ReplyDelete
  19. BTW, Its not "anti-hate" or "anti-racism", its anti-white period. Any time you hear someone saying, "we have a race problem" what they mean is, "we have a white problem." Promoting race mixing, culture destruction and "multi-culturalism", are all clearly anti-white institutions and need to be always regarded as such. We're on the defensive, they are on the attack. It will stay that way as long as we let them define who we are and lie about who they are.

    I can go on for another few paragraphs about this but I'll leave it alone for now. I'm waiting for Floyd to come out here and claim he's not anti-white because he likes Christmas or something.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I totally agree with you, Chris. And if any white man stands up for his people or warns them of the coming destruction, he is labeled a hater.

    I will be Goddamned if I am just going to sit by when my people are being slaughtered(for example: The Wichita Massacre, or the brutal murders in Knoxville, Tenn.).

    ReplyDelete
  21. Chris, you are absolutely right about the main stream figuring out the Jew.

    When you sit at a local ball game and someone calls the ref a Jew because he doesn't like a ruling you know our ideas about the evil that is the Jew is becoming mainstream.

    I hear it all the time (and no, I am not prompting them to do it).

    People have had it with these hateful and destructive people.

    ReplyDelete
  22. R-i-i-i-i-ght. So every time some schlep says he got "gypped" by the used car salesman, he is invoking some deep-seated hatred of the Roma, Vonnie?

    Sorry, pal - I don't think people make the associations you do with the colloquial use of "Jew" as a verb to describe being short-changed or screwed, irrespective of the actual history of that usage as a slur.

    ReplyDelete
  23. HM, do you get out? I've sat through at least a dozen conversations (that I wasn't even participating in) where I heard regular folk talk about what you'd assume is only discussed in the movement. I want to burst in and say, "what you are saying is dead on, but where the hell did you get this stuff?" Actually, I normally just sit and listen to folks. When they ask, I say I agree and I'm into things...

    Sometimes you get the debate. I normally listen until the last part where I come and strike the death-blow to the marxist side of it. Its always the Christian who thinks it says somewhere in the Bible not to be racist, against the other Christian who knows better and thinks God created people the way he/she did for a reason. I stay out of those.

    Sometimes you get the brewing lynch mob who talk about what "ought to happen to jews and the like" until they stop themsevles because they think they are sounding too much like ignorent folk they have seen on Springer.

    Sometimes you hear folks exchanging interesting facts (normally things I've known for years) about jews. Often its making the jewish and black connection or the jewish and communist connection. Lots of times its something simple like, "they control the media and therefore the country."

    And blacks? Blacks are like the insane children who think they are everyone's favorites just because everyone is catering to them. I can't think of but a handful of people who don't have a semi-public breakdown over black behavior at least once a week. I assume the other part have fits of rage against them in private. Anyone who doesn't has either an inferiority complex or doesn't live around enough of them.

    So I mostly just listen. Americans are fighters, true, but most of them would rather wake up, chat about the weather and then return to sleep. For all the large talk, there is still only a small percentage who wants to get in the streets and do something. But thats all changing. Young people are getting braver, older people more angry. I sleep well at night with the way things are going.

    In the movement though, we aren't preparing to start a storm. We're just folk who are really just waiting for it to rain, and it always, always does. You folks are dancing around in the dust, with unbrellas, claiming to have conquered nature forever.

    ReplyDelete
  24. the prblm is democrapacy; and, as Winston Churchill once famously said: "a five minute conversation with the average voter will suffice to reveal the problems with democracy!"

    the only suitable method of governing is 'the aristocratic principle' like what they had in feudal days where, one might argue, the average peasant had more freedom than the average 'citizen' has to-day!

    the only prblm with feudal times was that, occasionally, right royal jerks got to be Top Dog!

    'the aristocratic principle' can be refined so that the best & the brightest 'ascends to the throne' as it were: when that happens: every-thing will be well: such a person will be incorruptible and not easily intimidated or threatened(having a surfeit of wealth and a large personal army/guard to protect them!) and will, more-over, have the best interests of their ppl/subjects @ heart!

    failing that: 'democracy' can only work if the 'voter pool' is drastically reduced: so that: similarly to ancient Greece, the only ppl 'eligible' to vote are rich, old, white men with large properties and large families!

    women should, IMO, not be involved in the political process; giving women the vote was, by & large, a mistake: they are, generally, too emotional and too easily swayed or put under pressure!....i believe that most 'car accidents', for instance, r caused, directly or indirectly, by female drivers!

    the current situation we now have in most western 'liberal democracies' is that voting blocs can be formed in such nations by large groups of non-white immigrants; the situation is furhter exacerbated by the 'two party system' there being no out-let for lawful dissent; and, of course, such parties can easily be 'taken over' @ the 'branch level' via such methods as 'vote stacking' by those same large, non-white groups!

    all in all: democracy, @ least as we have known it for the last sixty yrs or so, has, by any objective measure, been a failure!

    ReplyDelete
  25. Mike, isn't just the word Jew being used as a verb(like being Jewed). Like Chris, I too hear it in conversations with everyday people.

    I don't jump into these coversations or start them...I listen intently.

    It would seem everyday people have all of the sudden woke up or something or I just wasn't paying attention.

    ReplyDelete
  26. For those that don't already know there exists a state of war between ANSWP and the Nimbusters. ANSWP is directly responsible for getting the Nimbusters thrown off godaddy.com It is only a matter of time until we get them TOSed from their new server as well. Too long have they harassed the commander and WN's in general. Anyone with the stuff of manhood between their legs is encouraged to pitch in.

    ReplyDelete
  27. I don't know if they are thrown off...their site appears to be parked on godaddy right now.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Okay listen up Che be you Bill White sock or just your garden variety idiot. Nimbusters has nothing to fear from Bill or ANUS Wipe. The last time Billy bumps decided to tangle with us ...well he might remember it didn't come out so well for him.

    Von if you didn't have you tongue so far up Bill's Sigmond Colon you'd realize that Nimbuster's has moved:

    http://nimbusters.info/info/forum.php?board=8

    ReplyDelete
  29. VonBluvie wrote"I will be Goddamned if I am just going to sit by when my people are being slaughtered"

    Um Von quick question - who are "my people" ? if you mean white people, then you are a idiot as you dont speak for white people,in fact about the only people you could included in your statement "my people" are people like Gordon Young, KAS and Bill White (two perverts and nut)

    Floyd

    ReplyDelete
  30. The first and foremost thing you must realize about Vonnie, Floyd is what Schwartz has always said about him: Michael Belvins is not right in the head. He has delusions. The majority of white people would never want that idiot speaking for them.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Can't we just bash racists like Holsten and Billy White and Get along? Anyone know what happened to Steve's son in court? Little help here Mr. Schwartz?

    ReplyDelete
  32. P.S. Jimbo, slap yer mommy for making you so damn stupid.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Blevins and others like him.

    If you really did care about white people who are murdered, you would worry about the group that murders most of them. White people themselves.

    Over 4 out of 5 whites murdered are murdered by other whites. So if you really did about saving white lives, start with eliminating white on white murders first.

    Of course we all know why white supremacist don't worry about white on white crime don't we?????

    ReplyDelete

All comments must remain civil. No threats, racist epithets, or personal attacks will be tolerated. Rational debate, discourse, and even disagreement are all acceptable as long as they remain on point and within the realm of civility.