Friday, May 25, 2007

Kevin Strom - One Very Sick Individual



What has this man done? His name is Kevin Alfred Strom and he is a White Nationalist. Long considered one of the more erudite members of the white supremacist movement, Strom carried his message of racism and anti-Semitism to the air waves and to the internet. But, that isn't why he is in trouble.

A few months ago he was arrested on charges of child pornography and witness tampering and intimidation. Today - we finally heard about some of the evidence. In spite of all of the speculation that it was his estranged wife, Elisha Strom, who was setting him up, the truth is that Elisha was the recipient of his intimidation - and perhaps, even more recently, an attempt on her life.

Based on the evidence presented to the Grand Jury, it appeared to some that the child pornography charges were possibly the result of just internet surfing and unwittingly stumbling into an unwanted site. Those who were stalwart supporters of Strom would have liked to believe that. Then there were those who said, "I told you so."

What many didn't realize was that the evidence presented to a Grand Jury is generally minimal - just what law enforcement believes it needs to get an indictment. Strom is scheduled for trial on June 20th and a preliminary hearing was held today.

According to the prosecution, Kevin Alfred Strom was reported to authorities by the parents of young girl who Strom is accused of stalking for well over a year. Additionally, it is claimed that hundreds of pictures of that child and hundreds of pictures of child porn were found on his computer. I think you will agree that this is one very sick individual. In it's coverage the Daily Progress enumerates the prosecutions' case:

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Supremacist harassed child, prosecutors say
By Liesel Nowak
lnowak@dailyprogress.com | 978-7274
Friday, May 25, 2007


A self-proclaimed white supremacist facing child pornography charges previously harassed a local 9-year-old girl, according to a revealing pre-trial motion filed Thursday by federal prosecutors.

The filing comes a month before Kevin Alfred Strom, 50, is set to go to trial in U.S. District Court in Charlottesville on charges that he possessed child porn, enticed the girl for sex and tampered with a witness.

Between Septem-ber 2005 and December 2006, Strom got to know, contacted and eventually harassed the girl, according to the court filing.

Strom went to the child’s school, prosecutors said, and on one occasion hid behind a tree so the girl’s parents would not see him.

The student transferred to another school because of the repeated attempts Strom made to contact her, but the defendant researched and discovered the girl’s new class schedule, prosecutors allege.

Using a pseudonym, the document states, Strom sent the girl gifts, including a CD, a DVD, an angora sweater and a bouquet of roses.

Mark Potok, the director of the Intelligence Project, an arm of the Alabama-based Southern Poverty Law Center that researches and tracks hate groups, said Strom has been involved with the neo-Nazi movement for 30 years.

In 2005, Strom split with the National Alliance - formerly the largest white supremacist group in the country - to form the National Vanguard, which he ran from his Greene County home, Potok said.

According to the prosecution’s recent motion, a search of Strom’s personal computer revealed poems, “to be sung to the tune of ‘Here We Come a-Wassailing,’” written by the defendant, including the phrases “my love for [the girl] is not a sin.”

In addition to the prose, hundreds of pictures of the girl and hundreds of images of other children, some unclothed and in sexually suggestive positions, were stored on Strom’s computer, according to the court papers.

An unidentified witness in the case, prosecutors said, caught Strom naked at his computer looking at pictures of young girls. Paperwork filed by the defendant indicates that the witness is the defendant’s wife, Elisha Strom.

As a result of the his wife’s discovery, the couple signed a one-page notarized contract, prosecutors allege, in which Strom agreed to see a counselor until he is “free from being sexually drawn to children.” Prosecutors attached a copy of the document to their motion.

At one point, however, Strom labored under the mistaken impression that his wife had gone to authorities with her allegations against him, according to the prosecution’s motion. Consequently, Strom “accelerated a campaign to intimidate and discredit her,” which included physical assaults and verbal threats, prosecutors claim.

According to defense filings, Strom’s contact with the girl had nothing to do with the pornography charges against him and that it would be prejudicial to try the pornography counts with the enticement charge.

Defense attorneys say that there is “no evidence to suggest that Strom actually touched [the girl] or that she ever touched him.”

“He is essentially charged with attempting to make an attempt to commit sexual battery,” a defense motion states.

A judge will hear arguments on whether the charges against Strom should be divided into separate trials on Tuesday.

Daily Progress staff writer Rob Seal contributed to this story.

11 comments:

  1. No need to even comment further.

    ReplyDelete
  2. schwarz: "no need to even comment further";

    hmmm.....i beg to differ!

    while i know little or nothing concerning Strom's personal life, similar allegations are always surfacing in Oz!

    the whole area of 'child sexual abuse' is a dodgy one!

    most of the so-called 'abuse' is usually courtesy of trick-child-psychologists who, basically, concoct or 'implant' such stories in the minds of children: a procedure little different to the highly dubious practice of 'hypnotism'

    not that many yrs ago, 'children' under the age of 14 were not permitted to give evidence in courts of law because they: a/had trouble distinguishing fantasy from reality and b/are too easily threatened, intimidated and/or manipulated;

    as such: the testimony of a child under that age could not be trusted &, hence, was generally deemed in-admissible!

    back to Strom: it seems that the primary witness against him is his wife, Elisha!

    again: i know nothing of her either!

    but: i thought that a wife could not testify for or against her husband except in very specific circumstances?

    what-ever: this whole episode reeks of 'a set-up' to me: @ least, AFA the evidence so far presented by the media is concerned!

    'justice' is a scarce commodity in 'Kwa courts but, if competent counsel(another rare commodity in the 'Kwa it seems to me!) is engaged, then, under vigorous testing and cross-examination, the strength or weak-ness of the evidence against Strom will emerge!

    of course: that doesn't necessarily ensure an 'acquittal' because juries, at the best of times, are fickle bitches and a jury composed mainly of non-whites trying an avowed 'white supremicist' would be a very dodgy animal indeed!

    i reserve my judge-ment on Strom until, and if, the full weight of the evidence against him is competently and vigorously tested in a court of law and, after, the full gamut of the higher appeals process is exhausted!

    for a charge as 'suss' as 'child sexual abuse' in wht-ever form, this is the absolute minimum requirement!

    ReplyDelete
  3. R-i-i-i-ght.

    And Da Joos planted those images of the child he was stalking on his computer, right Jimbo?

    Also, your comment that "most of the so-called 'abuse' is usually courtesy of trick-child-psychologists" who "implant" stories of abuse in the heads of children is just plain ignorant.

    Believe it or not, I am someone who has worked in the field, and there is unfortunately quite a bit of this abhorrent behavior happening, and it cuts across all racial lines.

    Fathers raping their own children, mothers selling their kids for sex, teachers initiating sexual contact with students, live-in boyfriends and girlfriends preying on the children of their lovers: there are a lot of twisted people out there, dude.

    Oh wait, I forgot: it's that damned Joo media again, right?

    While there have indeed been some highly-publicized cases of false "recovered" memories enabled by dubious practitioners of psychology, these are anomalies.

    Many abused children never even get access to counseling - they carry their baggage with them for the rest of their lives.

    And as far as the testimony of children? The research I have seen only calls into question toddlers; by the time most children are 5 or 6 they are moving into stages of development where they can clearly distinguish between fantasy and reality, and are quite capable of providing reliable testimony on the stand.

    Finally, is everything a KWA/Joo conspiracy to you? Do you really live your life seeing Jewish bogeymen behind every corner?

    Gad, you must just be a real fun time at parties.

    Bob's your uncle...

    ReplyDelete
  4. 'historymike': And Da Joos planted those images of the child he was stalking on his computer, right Jimbo?
    yr a real 'gun-jumper' ain't u, champ?
    hunh?
    like all the rest of the so-&-so's on this 'blog, u hv a pre-existing ideological agenda independent of the facts!
    let's see now: for a court of law to accept that said 'images' were the sole prpty of one Mr Strom, they would have to establish beyond reasonable doubt:
    i/only Strom had sole access to the computer-in-question;
    ii/Strom was accessing the computer when the images were placed on its HDD!
    iii/Strom was aware of the images being on his computer(there are all sorts of 'trojan horses' out there that can place all sorts of material on HDDs un-beknownest to the owner!)
    now: establishing all that is no mean feat! because, in addition to being able to prove these elements beyond reasonable doubt, there is a little thing in law called mens rea...it means: INTENT!...this is prtclry applicable for element n°3....even if i & ii were established, it would have to be ALSO proven beyond reasonable doubt that Strom knew the images were on his HDD & was regularly accessing them!

    Also, your comment that "most of the so-called 'abuse' is usually courtesy of trick-child-psychologists" who "implant" stories of abuse in the heads of children is just plain ignorant
    no it's not! most of the cases presented in Oz courts, @ least, involve some air-headed 'child shrink' or t'other; in recent yrs, such bogus testimony has been vigorously contested by expert evidence from Oxford-trained psychiatrists amongst others!
    knowing the shitty state of the 'Kwan legal system, some ½-trained eedjit would be rolled out with some ludicrous testimony and that would be accepted as 'gospel'!

    Believe it or not, I am someone who has worked in the field, and there is unfortunately quite a bit of this abhorrent behavior happening, and it cuts across all racial lines
    so wot?
    i couldn't give a "rat's" whr u work, china!
    what i do know: is that the over-whelming majority of such allegations made almost exclusively against white, hetero-sexual men in Oz is BULLSHIT?
    what do you base yr assertion that
    'there is unfortunately quite a bit of this abhorrent behavior happening'...anonymous 'phone calls? 'statements' from six-yr-old kids who still believe in the Tooth Fairy and Santa Claus? the un-corroborated testimony of some vengeful shrike in a 'Family Court' who is only after the white husband's assets and income?
    what sort of 'test' do you apply to such 'evidence' hunh?
    'a criminal standard of proof'; i.e: 'beyond reasonable doubt';
    'a civil standard of proof';
    i.e:'on the balance of probabilities'
    'an anecdotal standard of proof'
    i.e: 'it`s a possibility'
    or 'a hear-say standard of proof'
    i.e: Joe Bloggs told Fred Nurk that Harvey X Rumplestilsken had 'molested' his kids?!?
    hunh?
    which is it?

    Fathers raping their own children, mothers selling their kids for sex, teachers initiating sexual contact with students, live-in boyfriends and girlfriends preying on the children of their lovers: there are a lot of twisted people out there, dude
    so you say: but: be so kind as to break it down into racial demographics while yr @ it!
    'rape' is one of the dodgiest charges on the criminal calendar: @ least it is now with any friggin' slag gettin' up in a court of law five or more yrs after the alleged 'incident' and making a her-word-against-the-accused's allegation!
    and: how many of yr 'allegations' are thirty or more years old?...well past their use-by date?
    and: how many involve the attempted 'ripping off' of the Catholic Church?
    there's only three things 'cut it' in a criminal investigation:
    i/hard forensic evidence;
    ii/corroborating eye-witnesses
    and
    iii/a full, frank and voluntary confession(with video-taped police inter-view AND video-taped re-enactment!)

    Oh wait, I forgot: it's that damned Joo media again, right?
    sure it is....BTW: how come we never see exposes on the 'movers & shakers' in the child porn' industry; oh...i forgot: of course!...their 'ethnicity' means that they are a 'protected species', right?

    While there have indeed been some highly-publicized cases of false "recovered" memories enabled by dubious practitioners of psychology, these are anomalies
    horse-shit!
    there's been NUMEROUS CASES...some more well-publicised than others; in Oz, there has also been NUMEROUS CASES where 'child abuse convictions' have been over-turned on appeal....all this is more than sufficient to cast this whole legal area in a less-than-rosy-light!

    Many abused children never even get access to counseling - they carry their baggage with them for the rest of their lives
    'abused children'?
    how abt the friggin' kike-run ABORTION INDUSTRY?
    ain't THAT the biggest 'child abuse' of the lot?
    can you get any more 'abusive' than cold-blooded butchery?
    and: this 'carrying baggage' bull-shit!
    that's another hall-mark of the 'abuse industry', a sub-set of the pscyho-babble industry: all set up to pathologise and criminalise the behaviour of white, hetero-sexual men!
    people have survived all sorts of SHIT...from natural disasters to war zones to epidemics of diseases and GOT ON WITH THEIR LIVES!....end-less whining & whingeing is a kike characteristic and the characteristic of a kike-controlled industry!

    And as far as the testimony of children? The research I have seen only calls into question toddlers; by the time most children are 5 or 6 they are moving into stages of development where they can clearly distinguish between fantasy and reality, and are quite capable of providing reliable testimony on the stand
    friggin crap!
    what 'evidence'?
    CITE IT!
    5 or 6?
    utter and complete BULLSHIT!
    so: they can still believe in Father Xmas and still believe in a totally imaginary incident simultaneously, right?
    sorry: pal: this is the REAL WORLD!...not Alice in Bloody Wonderland....where we can 'believe six impossible things before break-fast'!

    Finally, is everything a KWA/Joo conspiracy to you? Do you really live your life seeing Jewish bogeymen behind every corner?
    pretty much!
    our whole way of life has been FUCKED UP by these bastards!
    i stand on MacDonald's irrefutable research for that one!
    they've fucked my life and the life of many other good, solid white people!
    very soon now, we're gunna 'ante up'!

    Gad, you must just be a real fun time at parties
    i don't go to 'parties' (except for the occasional 'skin-head' one!); i drink in public bars and/or have mates over to my place for a few quiet ales...that's IT!

    Bob's your uncle...

    ...and Fanny's yr aunt!

    ReplyDelete
  5. "what i do know: is that the over-whelming majority of such allegations made almost exclusively against white, hetero-sexual men in Oz is BULLSHIT?"

    What I do know is that dementia runs a deep thread through the white supremacist movement and you are proof positive that ignorance is definately flourish there as well.

    Child abuse and child molestation is absolutely rampant - turn on the damned news - look at the gruesome pictures - then come back and tell me.

    I, too, have worked in that area for several decades, and I am here to tell you that the pain and anguish experienced by children at the hands of the perverted and sick individuals who inhabit our society should never be felt by any child.

    Molestation of children is NOT a "vicitmless" crime - AND...the vast majority of pedophiles and child abusers are WHITE. Not that race makes one damn bit of difference - but you need to chew on that fact.

    And for all of your "Oz's" and "Kwa's" you don't know shit from perfume. Children are quite capable of telling us what happened and who did it. Certainly, there have been false charges - but few in comparison with the righteous ones.

    Personally, when it comes to this issue, ideology doesn't matter - it's about the kids. And...a large number of your "friends" agree. You need to check yourself, asswipe.

    ReplyDelete
  6. nikki spouts off more ZOG bull-shite: Child abuse and child molestation is absolutely rampant -turn on the damned news - look at the gruesome pictures - then come back and tell me
    oh yeah...'da newz'...that's right...IOW: WTF BIG JEW WANTS U to hear, right?
    the newz?
    thatz yr prblm you stoopid twat...yr a gullible friggin' git!
    u think 'da newz' tells EVERYTHING abt a court case?
    hunh?
    you think a friggin' 30sec(@most) TeleVitz bite is a substitute for reading/sifting through a court transcript?
    pull the other one, you ZOG cunt!
    and: while yr @ it: grow a fckn brain and then check out this site!...u might fckn learn sumthin'!

    I, too, have worked in that area for several decades, and I am here to tell you that the pain and anguish experienced by children at the hands of the perverted and sick individuals who inhabit our society should never be felt by any child
    yeh?
    in all probability, you ARE a KIKE, u lyin' fckn TWAT!
    WTF abt the pain & anguish suffered by divorced kids who never knew their father?
    hunh?
    ain't that child abuse?
    WTF abt that you fckn feminist whore?
    WTF u got to say abt that u insufferable fckn SLAG?
    any 'evidence' is good enough for a fckn ZOG whore like u to break up white families...that's yr fckn agenda, right...you fkcn ZOG bitch?
    hunh?
    well: FUCK YOU! AND _FUCK_ THE HORSE YOU RODE IN ON!....howzat, bitch? hunh?
    yeh...some white bloke charged with a concocted fckn bull-shit 'offence' that wasn't even 'on the statute books' 30yrs ago...that's the fckn jew for you: oy vey!...the law is WTF we SAY, white man!

    Molestation of children is NOT a "vicitmless" crime - AND...the vast majority of pedophiles and child abusers are WHITE. Not that race makes one damn bit of difference - but you need to chew on that fact
    GO FUCK YR-SELF YOU FCKN WHORE!
    the VAST MAJORITY of white men accused of pædophilia are completely FCKN INNOCENT!...the 'rules of evidence' having been twisted to omit crap that no judge thirty years ago in his wildest night-mares would have considered 'admissible'!

    And for all of your "Oz's" and "Kwa's" you don't know shit from perfume. Children are quite capable of telling us what happened and who did it
    you wouldn't know the fckn 'truth' if you were FCKN KING HIT! WITH IT @ POINT BLANK RANGE, YOU FCKN SLAG!
    OF COURSE, children are INCAPABLE OF giving proper testimony....that's the same reason they aren't allowed to: drink alcohol, drive cars and own fire-arms: they are IMMATURE, both physically & mentally!....WTF do u think they were dis-allowed from giving testimony in courts a few short decades ago until femi-cunt ZOG whores like U took over, hunh?

    Certainly, there have been false charges - but few in comparison with the righteous ones
    of course, any-thing that advances the jew genocide against the White Race is 'righteous', right, you fkcn ZOG BITCH?
    sorry: you lying fckn CUNT: the over-whelming majority of such 'charges' are plain & utter BULL-SHIT!

    but: let any-one try & accuse me of 'child molestation' and i'll fckn TAKE THEM OUT!...better to face 'capital charges' than that bull-shit!

    Personally, when it comes to this issue, ideology doesn't matter - it's about the kids. And...a large number of your "friends" agree. You need to check yourself, asswipe.

    ReplyDelete
  7. nikki:Personally, when it comes to this issue, ideology doesn't matter - it's about the kids. And...a large number of your "friends" agree. You need to check yourself, asswipe

    check yr-self bitch!
    i pick my friends very fckn care-fully!: and keep a large distance between my-self and any-one who spouts ZOG shit: even if they espouse 'white nationalism' or 'neo-nazism'

    and: this whole 'child abuse' scenario is a crock of fckn ZOG shit....go tell it to the child molesting fckn Rabbis who rarely, if evr, face a court of law you cunt!

    as i said: let any-one accuse me of 'child molestation' (to my face) and they'd wanna be fckn SICK of LIVING!

    ReplyDelete
  8. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I sure hope that Mr Strom beats these trumped up charges. He seems like a good ole boy who wouldn't do that Shit.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Mention pedophilia and Steve Holsten is attracted to it.

    Of course the retard is too stupid to realize that Strom himself admitted to being a pedophile in a notarized letter which his wife also signed.

    At least the Kennett voters saw right through Steve Holsten with him getting his ass kicked in the ballot box.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Ole Schwartzo is jealous of my greatness once again.

    ReplyDelete

All comments must remain civil. No threats, racist epithets, or personal attacks will be tolerated. Rational debate, discourse, and even disagreement are all acceptable as long as they remain on point and within the realm of civility.