Friday, February 10, 2006

Crime & Racist Pundits

Black on white crime is a favorite theme among white supremacists and neo-Nazi's. They labor long and hard to find evidence of atrocities committed by blacks against whites and they laboriously accumulate and amass examples of heinous acts. This has become almost laughably evident across the internet and interspersed throughout their propagandist literature. They embrace acts of black on white cruelty and scour the headlines for fresh "evidence" that blacks are animalistic and indiscriminately violent. Virtually every discussion held with a racist will eventually lead to black on white crime, and the lamentation that these acts are rarely ever given hate crime status.

We must first, in any discussion of "Hate Crimes," determine what the parameters of such a crime might be. In general terms, a hate crime is a criminal act perpetrated against an individual solely because of race, ethnic origin, religion or sexual orientation. Implicit within that definition is the idea that the perpetrator is racist, anti-Semitic, religion-intolerant or homophobic and that the act was committed out of hate. The definition is, in and of itself, problematic in that it requires knowledge of the perpetrator's ideology as well as mind-set at the time of the crime.

With the definition being stated, we must note that the vast majority of hate crimes committed are 1) not against persons but against property; and 2) committed by whites against people of color, differing ethnicities, differing religions or differing sexual preferences. Generally speaking, the perpetrators are self-avowed racists or otherwise intolerants.

Couched within the black on white crime rhetoric espoused by the right-wing extremists are statistical data which is proffered as proof positive that whites are under siege by the black population and that blacks are far more apt to commit violence against whites than the other way around. After all, numbers don't lie. However, those eager and devoted to furthering a "white agenda" often utilize figures to achieve that end regardless of how skewed or out of context those figures might be.

The United States of America holds the distinction of being the most domestically violent nation on the face of the Earth. To extrapolate from our crime statistics, however, that one group of people is far more violent than another is quite a gigantic leap even for the most zealous advocate of any cause. The fact that there are so many in mainstream Americans who are able to make such a leap is simply demonstrative of how easy it is for racist propaganda to be internalized. Even if the statistics presented were pristine and without compilation biases and variables, one would have to look at the picture in its' entirety from a sociological and macrocosmic perspective.

The continued and dogmatic assertions of the supremacist, et. al., that violent crimes are melanin specific meet their demise when presented with the violence of a Timothy McVeigh, a Buford Furrow, a Richard Baumhammers or a Benjamin Smith. However, most rational individuals, when confronted with the racist rhetoric, refuse to engage in a tit-for-tat exchange of comparison. Often what transpires is a process of rationalization and an attempt to refute their statements with a broader look at the causes of such criminal activities. The upshot is that neither side ever capitulates and the argument deteriorates into an exercise of obvious futility.

In actuality, questioning whether blacks are more violent than whites or why most serial killers and pedophiles are Caucasian, while being an intrinsically and perhaps challenging psychological journey, does not in the end provide us with closure or anything more definitive than mere speculation. And even if the "whethers" and the "whys" were to be answered we would still be left with the unanswered and over-riding question - "What difference does it make?"

Throughout all of the verbiage and discourse that surrounds the discussions of black on white crime or white on black crime, the central crux of the problem is absent thereby rendering all of those discussions circular and non-productive. As discussions of crime have become increasingly racialized we, as a society, have been engaged in the age-old practice of scapegoating. Our obsession with laying blame has served no other purpose than to marginalize the greater issue of American crime and its solution. Even then, the looming question in all of this remains "Why do we even engage in such statistical breakdowns?" If a person is gunned down in their driveway is he/she any more or less deceased if the shooter is of a different race? Is the family any more or less traumatized? Should the crime be any more or less punishable based upon the ethnicity of those involved?

The issue is crime. The statistical machinations and divisions of crime along racial lines is the outcropping of a government and its entities born in colonialism and steeped in white privilege. The only basis that it serves is to provide extremists with yet another vehicle to further their dogma. Their utilization of such figures is simply another attempt at justifying their unjustifiable agenda of white separation and ethnic cleansing. Any discussion along the lines of crime and race merely provides them with another forum from which to spew their venom and serves to perpetuate their convoluted and vitriolic version of "the truth."

Once a veteran in racist dialogue you quickly realize that the issues being brought to the forefront are generally those which the "movement" has been able to spin in a racist direction - and there are few issues which remain untouched by the spin doctors of hatred. The color of crime is probably the most over-used tool within the racist arsenal. Repetition is an integral part of the art of propaganda and the racist factions have mastered this well. Consequently, the discussion has found its way into mainstream America and will continue to be a point of contention for racist right who are scrambling for the conservative vote. All of this delineates the dangers of the propagation of racist maneuverings and the proliferation of racist ideology.

25 comments:

  1. Oh come on Nikki!

    You know very well that Blacks have a higher incidence of criminal behavior than Whites.

    This is beside the point (well frosting on the cake is more like it) however; WN’s simply want to preserve the future for White children and the White race.

    We are conservationists.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bullshit, Stefan - save it for someone who hasn't been around the block yet.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bullshit, Stefan - save it for someone who hasn't been around the block yet.
    ======

    Which part?

    ReplyDelete
  5. once again nikki shows to the world her little gnat brain has been wasted away by the infestation of leftist manure infected lies

    all of society knows instinctively that blacks are a cursedly depraved race, violent and criminal by nature, only by divine providence could a remnant have been brought over to the new world and breed themselves into a very sizeable nation, to have a chance (though white cultural influence) to become civilized, prospering and free, a world of difference compared to their historic homeland (the dark continent-africa)

    but in spite of the black nation's fantastic and wonderful advancement and attainment many of her citizenry continue to whine and cry like vast multitudes of diaper-rashed infants wailing for attention, a people never happy, ever complaining, always blameing the majority race (white people) for their poor circumstances, envious and jealous at the fast advances of other minority groups (asians) a people enshrined with the assumption of entitleement and favoritism, and yet of all this their lot is far worse today than it was 50 years ago when the great 'black civil rights' con game was born

    any american born black face who is honest with themselves who is 50 years and over will admit the condition of their people is worse spiritually today while they are certainly richer physically, they are plauged with problems that were almost non existence in times past: youth gangs, fatherless children, bastard children, foul mouthed ill disciplined youth just to name a few things,

    and when it comes to crime the black race culture is doomed to breed themselves into crime and condemn a larger and larger percentage of their seed to reside in prison through the hip-hop rap crap music filth they are influenced by, the gang look and personna, the inability to grow up and act and walk in a responsible civilized manner, and probably most of all the continuing infantile inability to take personal responsibility for their actions, and after all why should they when they have at their disposal vast herds of stupid guilt ridden whites (like nikki) ever eager to bear their white guilt burdens

    it was revealed the other day that the crime rate of new orleans is remarkably light, no surprise when the blacks are reduced in population the crime rate falls dramatically, it has been known for decades that the higher black populated cities bring with it much much higher violent crime

    but of course all of this does not matter at all to nikki, she is a perfect white racedead zombie following her marching orders to hate and defame and slander her own race day after day until that wonderful and glorious day when the white race disappears

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Once again, Nikki, you regurgitate the phrase "white privilege". This so-called "white privilege" is not universally available to all whites, so the phrase is disingenuous.

    There are "privileged whites" just as there are privileged members of other races, but there is NO "white privilege". As a matter of fact, it is the refusal of a white President, George W. Bush, to control our borders that has inflicted more damage on America's mainstream white community than the actions of all the black political reverends like JE$$E JACK$ON and Al $harpton combined.

    Remember the 14 Words!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Once again, Nikki, you regurgitate the phrase "white privilege". This so-called "white privilege" is not universally available to all whites, so the phrase is disingenuous.
    ======

    A popular mantra among the antifa (who accurately stole their name from a violent Russian ant-fascist organization) crowd is the notion of oppression and privilege. By insinuating that the Black race is oppressed they can begin to explain away the blatant gap between the living standards and behavior that exists between Whites and Blacks.

    They fail to understand the notion of equality (or better yet: the lack of). There is nothing equal on this planet.

    2.2 does not equal 2.3.

    The liberal media would like us to believe that since we are all humans by standard scientific classification (though that could be argued as well) then we are all equal by default.

    A Pit Bull and a Labrador are both dogs but only one of these variants will be chosen as a ‘family pet’ and only one will be chosen as a ‘guard’ dog.

    Why then are human variants any different?

    Evolution has set collective boundaries on each race and to pretend these boundaries don’t exist is foolish.

    Eliminating inequality is impossible.

    They want to eliminate ‘discrimination.’ But think of it…. A dumb person is discriminated against when he applies for a spot in a University, a short person is discriminated against when applying for the NBA; then why not race?

    Why is race a taboo?

    ReplyDelete
  9. i am greatly encouraged to see some of my white brethren (stefan schmidt, alaska wingnut, elmer frazier) contribute to this weblog-website (haha i wonder if to the dismay of nikki-nikita)

    i for one have no regard whatsoever for black history month, and while it becomes unavoidable to mix with this race in the work place and in the comings and goings of retail shopping and other city activities, i sure as hell do all that i can to avoid this race (discriminate) in the residential sector

    i am damn tired of the racial numbers game and the general bullshit and race pimping that black leaders enslave themselves to follow, maybe it is that they subconsciously think of themselves as indeed being inferior to the majority race and jew and asian, maybe they realize all that they have to go on is their slavery heritage, to turn that into a perpetual memorial following the crafty jew and their jew holycaust

    yet again i am reminded how blacks have completely corrupted the once valiant appeal from their black civil rights patriarch 'MLK' who intoned "let us be judged by the content of our character, not on the color of our skin", most blacks have no desire at all to be judged on the basis of character and are happy to hide behind their precious and favored black pigmented skin, wherever they roam they make sure to unroll that sleeve and bare that black skin, grabbing at it and sticking it in the face of whitey with an expectation of favored treatment they have grown to feel entitled to with a subtle hint of threats of 'racism' if they are not recognized for their race and treated with preference

    the day will come when we have become so saturated with minorityism that whites will be thought of as being 'soulless' and void of 'ethnic life' and any white embracing their racial heritage and their race role models will be guilty of 'racism', only minority (with blacks at the top of the minority pyramid) culture will be taught

    ReplyDelete
  10. excellent weblog-websites from elmer frazier, just the way i had nikki-nikita pictured

    ReplyDelete
  11. Let's go Nigger Lover. I have this post saved. I'm not having to re-type it.

    Here is the post ajax spoke of...

    Nikki said...
    Bullshit, Stefan - save it for someone who hasn't been around the block yet.

    We all know that Nikki has been around the block. Just look at: http://nikkinicholsblog.blogspot.com/ and http://nicolepussynest.blogspot.com/

    Nigger Lovers like Nikki and the other Nigger Lovers would not see the Nigger truth if it slapped them up side their heads. They are warped and very intelligence challenged. I'd bet that if Niggers broke in on Nikki's family and harmed them that she'd still be a Nigger Lover

    ReplyDelete
  12. It pains me Nikki but I must agree with Stefan. Blacks do have a higher incidence of committing crimes. However, I believe this to
    be related to socio-economics rather than race.

    Steve, ranting and raving only makes you look like a dumbass. If you want to get any point across trying discussing it rationally instead of "showing your ass."

    Crap, I was serious for a whole five minutes. Damn, okay that should do me for the whole month.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I didn't have to show my Ass if my post had've been left alone to start with.

    ReplyDelete
  14. It pains me Nikki but I must agree with Stefan.
    ======

    Am I that contemptible?

    ======
    Blacks do have a higher incidence of committing crimes.
    =======

    She might have not disagreed on this issue but rather the line: WNs are conservationists. That is why I asked her to clarify her comments.

    =======
    However, I believe this to
    be related to socio-economics rather than race.
    ========

    Yet WV is just as poor and is far safer than a city like Detroit.

    Look UF (Mr. Coleman), I have nothing against you. I do not know why you detest me since I have never insulted you (and you have attacked me three times). I even complemented your blog which is funny (especially the Photoshop work).

    ReplyDelete
  15. I'm beginning to believe that UF is really a Nigger Lover who tries to act like a WN. He sure has issues.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I'm beginning to believe that UF is really a Nigger Lover who tries to act like a WN. He sure has issues.
    ======

    I do not believe he ever was a WN….. He has revealed several times his attraction towards Black women….

    ReplyDelete
  17. all of Steve's posts should be deleted. He is incapable of communicating in an adult fashion, he is repulsive

    ReplyDelete
  18. I think that is all put on. It wouldn't surprise me if he's never had a woman.

    ReplyDelete
  19. all of Steve's posts should be deleted. He is incapable of communicating in an adult fashion, he is repulsive.

    No Turd, I don't want your Faggot advances towards me. So, Fuck off...

    ReplyDelete
  20. This article is about the most ridiculous screed I have read on this blog. Much of it is laughable.

    But let us be honest: crime is crime and criminal activity should be punished.

    White Nationalist didn't come up with the brilliant idea of "hate crime" or "thought crime" but since it IS in the public debate we WILL talk about about it.

    Numbers don't lie. It is a fact that most interracial crimes are committed by blacks against whites. Go ask the FBI.

    ReplyDelete
  21. White Nationalist didn't come up with the brilliant idea of "hate crime" or "thought crime"
    ====================

    Nazis did, see germany 1933-1945

    something tells me you know very little about the orginal Nazis, methinks you are just attracted by the costumes

    ReplyDelete
  22. Nazis did, see germany 1933-1945

    something tells me you know very little about the orginal Nazis, methinks you are just attracted by the costumes
    =======

    Nazis were not WNs they were German Nationals.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Oh...Mr. Blevins - "thought crime?"

    And you are right - he doesn't know anything about the original Nazi's - he's just play-acting - and doing that very poorly.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Nazis were not WNs they were German Nationals.

    I know that, I was referring to idea of "hate crime" or "thought crime"

    It is a wonder how any WN could follow Nazism as they destroyed and killed more White's that any other non-white group of the past century. All WN should look down in disgust at the Nazis just as they look down in disgust on communism

    ReplyDelete

All comments must remain civil. No threats, racist epithets, or personal attacks will be tolerated. Rational debate, discourse, and even disagreement are all acceptable as long as they remain on point and within the realm of civility.