Thursday, July 23, 2009

Lunatic Fringe Radio

July 23 Lunatic Fringe Radio first broadcast, you can here it here:
http://www.supload.com/listen?s=HU5Aeu


Tune in tonight at 11pm to Lunatic Fringe Radio - One of Tonight's Topics is Neo Nazi "Commander" Bill White Sell Out Racist Broadcaster Hal Turner ?
" Bill White is a rat..."

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/Lunatic-Fringe-USA



Tune in Thursday July 23 at 11pm est. as Lunatic Fringe Radio discusses the latest news and activities of the American Radical Right Wing.

This week some of the topics covered: Fed. Judge Dismisses Charges Against American Neo Nazi Leader;

Sarah Palin:Saint or Lunatic?;

Overview of right-wing crimes and trends;

Awarding the First "Lunatic Fringe Award" and Your Calls !

More Information Here: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/Lunatic-Fringe-USA

Call In Number: (347) 857-3972

41 comments:

  1. So does this radio show broadcast from an alternate dimension where the Virginia Tech shootings didn't take place, no such thing as the "beltway snipers", there is no such place as MODERN DAY AFRICA, no mass killings for Jews in the Middle East, no 20 million dead as a result of their invention of communism and no such thing as black crime in America? If so, I'll be sure to listen. On second thought, even that sounds boring as hell.

    Why not open up your own softdrink factory in your basement? I mean, there just isn't enough soft drinks in the world. Coke is under funded, just like Pepsi.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am reposting this because I believe that this clearly shows Nikki's double-speak. It clearly shows her untenable position of calling for restrictions on the Constitution while paying lip service to it:


    Nikki said...
    Let me clear something up...

    Anonymous said...
    Oh, NOW, Nikki agrees with the judges decision when it was only 8 or 9 months ago she was calling for the DOJ to arrest Mr. White and bellowing that his "threats" were not protected.

    Nikki, this is why I call you a hypocrite and now after reading your latest article (glad you finally came around) a LIAR!

    1) Nowhere in this article did I retract my opinion that threats of violence and intimidation should not be protected.

    2) What I did say is that AFTER reading the dismissal, and the case law upon which the judge's decision was made, and realizing that the government's case against White was deficient in so many ways, I must agree with the decision to dismiss.

    3) This does not mean that I agree with the purist interpretation of the First Amendment.

    4) I agree with Anchorage Activist in that the charges Bill faces in Roanoke are much more substantial and am taking a wait-and-see stance based on the current climate of the courts.

    5) I am deeply disturbed that the government failed to make their case. I happen to know that they had a lot more on Bill that evidently wasn't presented. This raises a lot of questions for me - and it should for you as well.

    6) I still contend that the intent of the First Amendment was not to protect that which victimizes others. What good is the right to speak freely if I can use it to silence you?

    7) It is also my opinion that rights come with responsibilities. As decent, moral, and humane people with, hopefully, integrity and good character, we have a duty to act in a responsible manner.

    Now, with that being said, do I think "hate speech" should be banned? No. Threats of murder, violence, and intimidation, however, have no place in a free and civilized nation.

    Bill White will have to answer to Roanoke. After that, who knows? One thing for certain, though - he is no champion. After all the things he has done to those in and out of the movement I can honestly say that he has no integrity and his sole reason for being is self-aggrandizement -not his family, not his crew, not anything other than himself.

    July 23, 2009 10:06 AM

    ReplyDelete
  3. POP QUIZ!

    Can you spot the contradictions between the two disjointed statements below?

    2) What I did say is that AFTER reading the dismissal, and the case law upon which the judge's decision was made, and realizing that the government's case against White was deficient in so many ways, I must agree with the decision to dismiss.

    3) This does not mean that I agree with the purist interpretation of the First Amendment.
    --Ms. Nikki Doublespeak

    ReplyDelete
  4. "I happen to know that they had a lot more on Bill that evidently wasn't presented."--Nikki

    Oh, really, just what would that be? You are such a silly loudmouth.

    If you read the indictment against him (and you claimed you did and if they had more they would have put it in that indictment--I think you know that.) I remember you clearly stating that you thought the gov had a good case against him.

    You gonna deny that too? lol

    ReplyDelete
  5. One of my answers to the quiz:

    1. The judge's opinion was Constitutionally purist in nature.

    2. Though Nikki states she disagrees with the "purist" she agrees with with the judge's decision whose decisions was based on that view.

    How'd I do on the quiz? Do I get a cookie? lol

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes, this glaring example of her leftist style hypocricy should be discussed and highlighted.

    Thanks for posting it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Some other good comments from the previous discussion thread on this.

    Anonymous said...
    Nikki, I could live in a world where it was illegal to threaten someone. I've been threatened by anti-racists for years. They've threatened my family, my extended family, children under my care and naturally, myself. Posting my name and address has been the least of their attacks. That being said, none of it has made one difference in the way I do things.

    What I want to point out is that if you take away the right to threaten and intimidate, you essentially casterate the anti-racist movement. Without threats, posting people's information and extortion (which as we have seen, is already illegal), what effective means do the anti-white racists have left? Are you considering this or do you think that the laws won't be enforced as long as only white people are being harmed?

    July 23, 2009 11:02 AM


    Anonymous said...
    Nikki, you can't have your cake and eat it too.

    July 23, 2009 12:08 PM


    Anonymous said...
    "1) Nowhere in this article did I retract my opinion that threats of violence and intimidation should not be protected."

    Well, then you DON'T agree with the judge because he stated in his 36 page opinion that though someone may "feel" intimidated that doesn't remove the protections of the 1st Amendment.

    Like the other anonymouse said: "You can't have your cake and eat it too".

    Essentially you are talking out of both sides of your mouth.

    July 23, 2009 12:14 PM

    ReplyDelete
  8. Will Nikki and crew be talking about the "Lunatic Fringe" that plagues the left as well?

    No, because this new show makes up that very same fringe. lol

    Your agenda is so damn obvious.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Commander MelcurJuly 23, 2009 12:00 PM

    First Anonymous poster is a whiner. Same whiner who posts on here all the time. Total idiot who can do nothing but whine cry and bitch. Why don't you get a job and you won't have as much time to cry?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Commander MelcurJuly 23, 2009 12:02 PM

    In fact the same asshole posted about 5 times straight. Get a job loser.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Ping Nikki(question):

    Given the similarities to the BW case; do you now believe Hal Turner's speech is protected under the 1st Amendment?

    ReplyDelete
  12. To the Anonymous reposter -

    You're just a little dense, huh?

    I agree with the decision to dismiss based upon the facts that the government did not present its' case and that he was not properly charged. I said that AFTER I read the entire decision and all of the precedent setting case law, I came to the conclusion that the judge had no other choice but to dismiss.

    However - that DOES NOT mean that I agree with his or others interpretation of the Constitution. It simply means that the government screwed up and didn't present their case adequately. Or, there is something else at play here.

    You also said...

    "If you read the indictment against him (and you claimed you did and if they had more they would have put it in that indictment--I think you know that.) I remember you clearly stating that you thought the gov had a good case against him."

    I'll say it once more. In a grand jury proceding, not all the evidence is presented. The government only presents what it believes is necessary to secure the indictment. Period. Yes - there was more - a lot more. Why they didn't present it, I'm not sure. Perhaps they are saving it for Roanoke as the charges are more substantial and they believe they stand a better chance of conviction? That's just speculation, of course.

    Or...maybe Bill gave them something they wanted more than him. In all honesty, I expected more charges to be brought before the case went to trial - they weren't. I find that very interesting.

    Is it possible that Bill gave up something on Hal Turner? Let me tell you - you had all better watch that budding love-fest between Bill White and Glenn Miller - just a word to the wise.

    ReplyDelete
  13. "2) Placing personal information on your website and advocating that the person be physically attacked or killed is outside the boundaries of those protections - or, in my opinion, should be."--Nikki

    But you said in this article is that you agree with the Judge's opinion on this. You have stated on more than one once that Bill's speech is OUTSIDE of those boundaries, but yet YOU AGREE with the judges opinion. I have to ask--did you actually READ the judge's 36-page opinion?

    ReplyDelete
  14. However - that DOES "NOT mean that I agree with his or others interpretation of the Constitution. It simply means that the government screwed up and didn't present their case adequately. Or, there is something else at play here."

    Given the dismissal was based solely on the Judge's interpretation of Constitutional rights I find it interesting that you reversed yourself by saying you agree with said decision.

    Just so that I am clear on this, do you still agree with the judge's decision to dismiss the case?

    ReplyDelete
  15. For the more "dense" among you folk.

    The judge's decision was based on his opinion that Bill White's speech WAS protected by the 1st Amendment.

    No other reason was given for dismissal of this case in Chicago.

    ReplyDelete
  16. So? People change their minds on things. That doesn't make them a hypocrit.

    Maybe Bill White did give up Hal Turner. It all would fit so far. What did Bill White owe Hal anyway? Hal laughed at Bill when he went to prison and paraded around bragging about it. Why sit in prison for years while your family goes hungry as your enemies sit around on welfare bragging about it?

    I hope none of that went on but if it did, it is what it is.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Nikki can't have her cake and eat it too.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Is that supposed to be something sexual?

    ReplyDelete
  19. "So? People change their minds on things. That doesn't make them a hypocrit."--anon

    I am glad that you can clearly see she changed changed her position on this.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Another partial victory for the good guys. Shaun Walker and Travis Massey had their prison sentences virtually sliced in half by U.S. District Judge Dee Benson in Salt Lake City on July 22nd. The review was directed by the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals back in April. Walker's sentence was reduced from 87 months to 37 months, and Massey's sentence was reduced to 30 months. Full details in the Salt Lake Tribune.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I doubt this will ever happen again but I reluctantly have to agree with Nikki. Bill White posted on Overthrown.com the jury foreman's name and address. He then posted something to the effect of "let's see who can get to him first and kill him" I read this with my own two eyes. It was never mentioned in the complaint against Billy Bumps. Bill cut a deal with someone. I wonder which of his friends is not going to like William any longer? Does he have any left.

    He'll never be as big a shit bag as Floyd but at this rate William will have betrayed almost as many as Blevins before the year is out.
    These cocksuckers give White Nationalism a bad name. They will get theirs in the end, never fear. Floyd will drink himself to death over his guilt and more than likely someone will pop a cap in Bill and Von's fat asses.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Nikki:

    There seems to be a metamorphosis occurring in the White Nationalist Movement in the last month. Bill White had his charges dismissed and might be free soon (didn't expect that), Hal Turner could benefit from that and walk too (really didn't expect that), Walker got his sentence cut (that's a surprise), and John Taylor Bowles has joined the American Nazi Party and reemerged and holding an event on August 29th with the Klan at the Redneck Shop in Laurens, SC (I wonder if he will run for President again?). It seems Schoep, Linder, and Metzger are being pushed to the back burner were they belong.

    ReplyDelete
  23. God is JusticeJuly 23, 2009 8:50 PM

    Shaun Walker and Travis Massey good guys? Give me a break they are coward scum who had to gang up two and three on one to beat up immigrants and Native Americans. If there is justice they will get their own asses beat everyday in prison. Hopefully DeLorean will write their black and Hispanic cell mates and tell them what who they are locked up with. That would be a hoot.

    ReplyDelete
  24. RWM:

    Who did Von turn on?

    ReplyDelete
  25. Yeah, who needs Tom Metzger? He had realistic approach to politics and almost won state office. Why even mention him while we've got the clowning of Taylor Bowles and his wacky presidential campaign? There isn't a better way to let the world know that white nationalism is a joke than what he is doing. Bravo!

    ReplyDelete
  26. Hey Nikki, WTF happened? Floyd was too drunk to call in and you hung up on yourself and then aborted that failure of a show?

    BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    NICHOLE NICHOLES = FAIL
    NICHOLE NICHOLES = FAIL
    NICHOLE NICHOLES = FAIL
    NICHOLE NICHOLES = FAIL
    NICHOLE NICHOLES = FAIL
    NICHOLE NICHOLES = FAIL
    NICHOLE NICHOLES = FAIL
    NICHOLE NICHOLES = FAIL
    NICHOLE NICHOLES = FAIL
    NICHOLE NICHOLES = FAIL
    NICHOLE NICHOLES = FAIL
    NICHOLE NICHOLES = FAIL
    NICHOLE NICHOLES = FAIL
    NICHOLE NICHOLES = FAIL
    NICHOLE NICHOLES = FAIL

    ReplyDelete
  27. FUCK NIKKI'S SHIT SHOW.

    You should listen to N.I.M. Nuts Radio Thursday 7pm EDT

    www.nimbusters.org

    YESSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  28. Nikki, can you ban the Nimbusters from posting here? Especially that idiot NewsGuy.

    ReplyDelete
  29. What happened to the show? I stayed up extra late to hear it but it just said "waiting for host to call in"

    ReplyDelete
  30. White Traitor Hal Turner was moved from the Oklahoma City Transfer Center and is now in Chicago MCC. Hopefully an Aryan Brother will stick something in him.

    In none related News Floyd was too drunk to use the phone last night and nigger fucking Nikki gave up the show in disgust.

    ReplyDelete
  31. I listen to Jimm Ramm's Forbidden Thoughts. His show kicks ass!

    ReplyDelete
  32. Lars, we have no doubts that you (Jim Ramm) listen to your own show.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Who would you all vote for:

    Taylor Bowles: convicted felon (inelligible for federal office), no political experience, no pre-existing elected support (state or federal), no visable voter support, no funding.

    Sarah Palin: no criminal record, extensive political experience, huge voter support, current major party support, large funding base, large elected support on all levels of government.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Anti racists are such idiots. Speaking of idiots, Ramm is definitely one of the biggest.

    But his show far more entertaining than that cunt Nikki's stupid radio show ever was.

    ReplyDelete
  35. When the "real" movement shows up let me know, until then don't bother me with idiots like Denuggent and Bowles.

    ReplyDelete
  36. You can't even listen to this show because apparently they don't know how to post a link to the archive.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Nikki - why do you allow punks like "a real white man" to post here?

    ReplyDelete
  38. What? I can't hear you with that dick in your mouth!!

    ReplyDelete
  39. Nikki on put HIV + Nigger dicks in her mouth bitch.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Nikki, why are and the resident drunk implying that Bill ratted to get off these charges? It doesn't work that way...not with a 36 page opinion btw.

    Hal has been charged with BS he posted on his website (that all could see...accept BW who was cooling his heels in prison).

    You people are doing nothing but obfuscating and outright lying to cause confusion. We aren't all stupid out here and we know what you are trying to do.

    ReplyDelete

All comments must remain civil. No threats, racist epithets, or personal attacks will be tolerated. Rational debate, discourse, and even disagreement are all acceptable as long as they remain on point and within the realm of civility.