UPDATE: 3:00
She was so frightened after reading his letter that she packed her things and fled. That was the tesitmony of Tiese Mitchell on the stand this afternoon.
Mitchell was one of several African-American tenants in a dispute with a white landlord and who were targeted by Bill White's relentless intimidation tactics.
The letter, after a rant about blacks on welfare, stated, “You may get one over on your landlord this time, and you may not. But know that the white community has noticed you, and we know that you are and will never be anything more than a dirty parasite – and that our patience with you and the government that coddles you runs thin.”
Mitchell said that the language and the tone of the letter, as well as the knowledged that White knew where she lived, caused her to leave her home with her two small children and run to a relative.
The letter was addresse to: “Whiny Section 8 Nigger.”
As we await new information from the trial, WSLS has put out this update:
Douglas Hantske, a member of the National Alliance, a neo-Nazi group unfriendly toward Bill White, took the stand for the prosecution this morning. Hantske testified that he had delivered racist fliers in the neighborhood of Leonard Pitts after seeing his address posted on White's website.
Bill White’s trial is underway- three days down and almost three weeks expected to go.
There are still some witnesses we could possibly hear from, including a University of Delaware professor who directed a training program for the school a couple years ago.
According to the indictment, White allegedly told the professor’s secretary he would hunt the professors down and that anyone who views racism the way she does should be shot.
White allegedly claimed the university forced students to think all white people are racist. Then he allegedly posted the professor’s home address online.
Also, there’s a collective group of people from Virginia Beach. About two years ago, they accused their landlord of discrimination and according to the indictment, White allegedly wrote letters back to them standing up for their landlord.
Another run-in with White involved a lawyer from outside the U.S. Three years ago, a Canadian lawyer shut down White’s Canadian-based web site. Since then, the indictment says White wrote an article on overthrow.com, allegedly writing to kill the man.
We’re not sure when we will hear from these possible witnesses over the week. But when everyone has finished testifying, the jury needs to decide if White is guilty of the crimes he’s charged with-not his views.
Apparently, the prosecution is attempting to establish that racists and white supremacists not only read Bill's website, but utilized information posted there, hence furthering the idea that the probability of violence or harm could befall White's victims.
Agent Church also relayed a conversation he had with White before bringing formal charges in which White had tried to convince him that what he wrote was meant to be political satire and nothing more. White claimed he didn't intend for anyone to get hurt and that he was "simply mocking" the people with whom he disagreed on matters of race.
More as the morning break ends.
...Richard Warman, a Canadian human rights lawyer....
ReplyDeletewtf has Warman got to do with this case?
he's not even a US citizen, ferFCKsake!
ohh....and.....BTW...he's not "a human rights lawyer"...he's simply a shill for the shekel-shuckers!...the only "minority" he "defends"...my under-standing is that he's officially in the "employ" of the ADL...as such, he basically couldn't give a TOSS abt nigz, nogz, spicz or gookz...only "protecting the interests" of rich, powerful jew bastards!
The sooner this sack of shit is in jail the better. They should give Bill at least 5 years. 10 would be better, I hope he gets his fat ass beat each and everyday he is locked up. I hope Blevins is right behind him (no pun intended).
ReplyDeleteHere's an article for ya...
ReplyDeleteby Dan Casey of the Roanoke Times...
One of the best shows in town these days is the federal criminal trial of a racist crank who is charged with threatening various people all over the North American continent.
The defendant is one of Roanoke's low-rent landlords, William A. White.
He's also the narcissistic costume-Nazi "commander" of the American National Socialist Workers Party.
White's trial started last week, and I dropped in there for a spell Friday to hear the testimony of Leonard Pitts, the Pulitzer Prize-winning nationally syndicated columnist who is one of White's alleged victims.
His column runs in this newspaper, and I am a big fan. And I wanted to get his personal take on the charges against the biggest jerk in town.
Plus, it's always kind of fun to watch thuggish buffoons like Bill White on the hot seat, you know?
But the entertainment value diminished quickly after Pitts, who is black, began testifying.
Over the course of about two hours, he described to the all-white jury his reactions to a phone call his wife took from White one night in June 2007.
It was followed the next morning by two e-mails White sent Pitts. One had the subject line "N----r Pitts," and a link to an Internet post in which White revealed Pitts' unlisted phone number and home address to the world.
In the other, White quoted lyrics from a racist song prophesying the day when the white race would destroy and enslave all blacks.
"I was essentially chilled by the dehumanizing language," Pitts told the court. "What really sealed the deal and what really made my blood run cold was the reference to my home address and the reference to my wife."
White was saying, " 'I have all this information about you and the name of your wife and I can get to you,' " Pitts told the jury.
That was only the beginning. There are a lot of racist freaks like White out there, after all.
ReplyDeleteDozens of nasty phone calls and hundreds of hateful e-mails followed -- not from White but from others. Pitts felt compelled to warn administrators at his children's schools, the police in his hometown of Bowie, Md., and the FBI.
"My information was disseminated to people who were hateful and violent because of the color of my skin," Pitts testified. "It was terrifying."
White's defense is that his actions are constitutionally protected by the First Amendment, and that though he may have veered close to the line of unprotected criminal threats, he never crossed it.
Now Pitts and I have a few things in common. We're both newspaper columnists who are married with a bunch of kids and are the same age.
White has published both of our home addresses and phone numbers on the Internet.
Both of us utter strong opinions -- Pitts' best are on issues of race -- and we both hope for a strong response from readers. That comes with the column-writing territory.
But the similarities pretty much end there. Pitts is big time and I am small fry. He has millions of readers and I have (hopefully) thousands.
And, of course, Pitts is black and I am white. That's the really big difference in this context.
Threat, you see, is kind of like beauty. It's more or less in the eye of the beholder.
Why should I have ever felt threatened when White published my address, phone number and photograph?
In this country, my race has never been systematically discriminated against in education, housing, employment and other ways.
No gangs ever donned cloaks and masks and hunted down and lynched white guys they hated because of their skin color.
In my lifetime, there has never been institutional racism against Irish-Catholic white guys. In those respects, I'll never be able to walk in Pitts' shoes, or fully comprehend the fears White evoked when he published Pitts' address and invited like-minded freaks to visit Pitts' home.
After his testimony, Pitts and I talked for a few minutes outside the courtroom.
Where do you believe the lines should be drawn between free expression and criminal action? I asked him.
"I think the line is drawn where there's an implicit suggestion of harm," Pitts said.
Do you believe Bill White's actions were criminal?
"That's one of the things I'm not going to talk about," he replied. "I'd rather wait until there's a verdict."
Do you feel at all uncomfortable at the idea that Bill White is on trial for his freedom, in part, because of something he wrote about you?
"No," he responded flatly.
Listening to Pitts' testimony Friday, it's not hard to understand why.
Richard Warman has been a target of Bill White's for a long, long time. Some of you might remember an interview that we did with Warman on the Eye On Hate Radio Show a few years back.
ReplyDeleteI am eagerly awaiting his testimony.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteOhhh Pitts knows how to work it, doesn't he? "All because of the color of mah skin..." I've seen three year olds who are less manipulative.
ReplyDeletePitts: you wrote an article about a kidnapping, murder and torture and told people to "cry you a river." You made people very angry. However, when people get angry at you, you call the mostly white FBI to come and protect you. Fair enough. When Bill White makes people angry, he goes to prison. Don't worry though. Nobody will ever be allowed to point this out in the mainstream media. You'll just get another pat on the head and have another treat tossed your way.
The above anonymous has a valid point.
ReplyDeleteIn the past, Nikki's Citizens Against Hate, routinely posted the addresses and personal information of people WN activist she didn't like.
BTW- I applaude Nikki for discontinuing the practice.
They talk about the cowardice of Nazis using police protection, but the Nazis sure as Hell don't get the legal cover the ARA and the like get from our "justice" system. Not only do they target people on the net... they literally get away with physical violence.
ReplyDeleteNO ONE gets the legal cover the left does--nobody.
"The essence of what is going on here is that the left is angry and fearful that some of its own tactics are being used against it. If it's not illegal for the left to publish innocent people's addresses, and pay for busloads of its activists to stand outside Whites' properties and scream about "burning them out," then it's hard to see how BW can be convicted of whatever he did. And that is why, even given a 100% biased media and court system, the charges against White have consistently been dismissed." --Alex Linder
ReplyDeleteI hate to admit it, but Linder is exactly right on that point.
Even the homeless don't have the right to free expression:
ReplyDeleteHomeless forced to take "Welcome to Obamaville" sign off tent city in Colorado
Could someone do Pitts a favor and translate this to English then hand it out to the jury members?
ReplyDeletehttp://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/e/ed/TowGreatestHitsRacism_-_1.jpg
It is becoming apparent,The Bill of Rights should be mourned, not celebrated. It is defunct.
ReplyDeletehttp://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/e/ed/TowGreatestHitsRacism_-_1.jpg
ReplyDeleteWoops!
The direct link to Dan Casey's blog is HERE. It is quite interesting, particularly the dialogue generated as a result. Casey's high regard for the First Amendment is commendable; as long as you're civil, you can post any point of view.
ReplyDeleteWhat the resultant dialogue indicates is that affirmative action continues to be the soft underbelly of today's successor to the civil rights movement. As long as affirmative action exists, it will provide invaluable grist for our propaganda mills. Just think how effective Bill White would be if he had a "hail fellow well met" personality rather than the standoffish patrician attitude he sometimes displays.
As it is, Bill White is clearly a political prisoner notwithstanding his personal deficiencies.
ReplyDeleteThe Soveit summary of Pitt's testimony
ReplyDeleteCommenting on 3pm update:
ReplyDeleteSo, essentially, this is boiling down to how people "felt" about what BW said to them?
Anonymous,
ReplyDeleteJust because someone "feel" they were "threatened" by a person doesn't make it against the law. Try getting a policeman to arrest someone if they made a threat against you. I bet you would get told that there was nothing that could be done UNTIL the person takes action against you. If we can not get someone arrested for threats, why do these other people rate differently?
Regardless of how heinous the speech is, free speech should be upheld in every situation. Without free speech, lots of negative things could happen. Take a look at the political prisoners of years gone by in other countries. Would any of us like that to happen to us if we said something somebody disagreed with? I think not. Limiting free speech or taking it away is a great way to get a police state.
Free speech is too important a right to lose, regardless of who uses it.
I am sure many WN and their families "felt" threatened every time they discovered their address, phone number, license plate and e-mail address listed on websites such as OPP and hundreds of other lefty sites.
ReplyDeleteWhere is their legal redress?
Stop talking about saving free speech, friend. You act like people on our side have it. The anti-racist side enjoys free speech by the boat load.
ReplyDeleteThe question here is one I think Bill White was trying to get people to ask all along. Should the government give the same legal rights to anyone other than their anti-racist American equvilant of Chinese flag girls.
Plain and simple, Bill White used the same tactics as the anti-racists and got nailed for it. People have been asking me, what good has come of this? Nothing if people just stand by. Something if people take to the streets and the net armed with the truth that can be harvested from it.
A lie that's been repeated over and over again is that the anti-racist movement is somehow against the system. That's like saying the KGB had nothing to do with communism. WHAT A FUCKING LAUGH. This trial CLEARLY shows how the legal doors have swung widely for the anti-racists lap dogs who have cost us our homes, our jobs, our reputations, our friends, our families, not to mention the physical attacks on us and our property. Name me one person on the anti-white/anti-racist side who has gone through something like this! NAME ONE. While you think, I'll be gathering you up a dozen anti-racist websites which were doing the sort of thing Bill White was doing back when he was drawing anarchy symbols on his 9th grade math book.
You on the white side, you aren't negroes. You don't whine and get your rights handed to you by big money. Your fight will be a real one before it's over with. Pay attention to "your" government's attitude towards you. Think any document in America will save you?
No, wait until you, your wife, son or daughter is attacked because someone thinks they are excited about being what they are. Wait until the movies stars and singers come down to side with the attackers. Try to squeek out your prayers and petitions over the Jewish media machine. Just wait until the justice machine is turned off so your tormentors can walk free.
Then you should think of Bill White. The mean ol' Indian who picked up a soldier's gun and tried to fight back on their terms---thats him in a nutshell. Damn the rules of warfare, anyone who attacks us is a war criminal.
Right now the focus of the pro-white movement should be stopping the attacks. We sat there and shook our heads and said, "fucking Jews..." each time someone got away with wronging us almost at the blessing of law enforcement. I say that we take to the streets and demand the arrests of anyone who has participated recently in any of Bill White's type of tactics, should he be arrested. I don't care if they call themselves a racist, a Maoist, anti-racist or whatever. It is time the world knew the weight and fickle nature of the New American Justice. It's time for us to get beat on, gassed, and worked over all over again---but this time do it for more than just where you stand on your race. Do it for justice.
Nikki, perhaps you will recall when The Roanoke Times published an online database of registered concealed handgun permit holders in the paper's community under the sanctimonious guise of "Sunshine Week."
ReplyDeleteHow do you think some of those 135 thousand having their complete personal information exposed by the Roanoke Times "felt"?
Excellent post above.
ReplyDeleteThere is a big difference between what Bill was doing and what the newspaper did. I can tell you from personal experience that Bill White was a stalker.
ReplyDeleteAs I've said, I don't want to see free speech limited but this guy was a ticking time bomb. I am so glad I am not on the jury, I wouldn't want to have their decision sitting in my lap.
"I am sure many WN and their families "felt" threatened every time they discovered their address, phone number, license plate and e-mail address listed on websites such as OPP and hundreds of other lefty sites.
ReplyDeleteWhere is their legal redress?
December 14, 2009 2:53 PM
Anonymous said...
Stop talking about saving free speech, friend. You act like people on our side have it. The anti-racist side enjoys free speech by the boat load.
The question here is one I think Bill White was trying to get people to ask all along. Should the government give the same legal rights to anyone other than their anti-racist American equvilant of Chinese flag girls.
Plain and simple, Bill White used the same tactics as the anti-racists and got nailed for it. People have been asking me, what good has come of this? Nothing if people just stand by. Something if people take to the streets and the net armed with the truth that can be harvested from it.
A lie that's been repeated over and over again is that the anti-racist movement is somehow against the system. That's like saying the KGB had nothing to do with communism. WHAT A FUCKING LAUGH. This trial CLEARLY shows how the legal doors have swung widely for the anti-racists lap dogs who have cost us our homes, our jobs, our reputations, our friends, our families, not to mention the physical attacks on us and our property. Name me one person on the anti-white/anti-racist side who has gone through something like this! NAME ONE. While you think, I'll be gathering you up a dozen anti-racist websites which were doing the sort of thing Bill White was doing back when he was drawing anarchy symbols on his 9th grade math book.
You on the white side, you aren't negroes. You don't whine and get your rights handed to you by big money. Your fight will be a real one before it's over with. Pay attention to "your" government's attitude towards you. Think any document in America will save you?
No, wait until you, your wife, son or daughter is attacked because someone thinks they are excited about being what they are. Wait until the movies stars and singers come down to side with the attackers. Try to squeek out your prayers and petitions over the Jewish media machine. Just wait until the justice machine is turned off so your tormentors can walk free.
Then you should think of Bill White. The mean ol' Indian who picked up a soldier's gun and tried to fight back on their terms---thats him in a nutshell. Damn the rules of warfare, anyone who attacks us is a war criminal.
Right now the focus of the pro-white movement should be stopping the attacks. We sat there and shook our heads and said, "fucking Jews..." each time someone got away with wronging us almost at the blessing of law enforcement. I say that we take to the streets and demand the arrests of anyone who has participated recently in any of Bill White's type of tactics, should he be arrested. I don't care if they call themselves a racist, a Maoist, anti-racist or whatever. It is time the world knew the weight and fickle nature of the New American Justice. It's time for us to get beat on, gassed, and worked over all over again---but this time do it for more than just where you stand on your race. Do it for justice."
Very cogent points, anonymous. Perhaps you put this post somewhere else where it will be a little more widely read. I can assure you no one here gives a damn about the legitimate points you are making.
Maybe you can counter some of Nikki's posts in the discussion area on Hammock's blog.
I personally feel this thing has been one sided. I can assure you no one is going to go after those commie stooges doing the same exact thing.
UF:
ReplyDeleteIt isn't just about the Roanoke Times. Daryl Lamont Jenkins did almost the same exact thing as Bill (in regards to the publication of personal information) in his "rogues" gallery for "Those that don't play nice".
The Daily Kos and Indymedia (well know leftist conglomerate) do many of the same things as Bill...well, actually from what I hear, worse...sometimes the left doesn't only threaten they actually follow through on them.
Latest example: What about the physical attack on David Erving?
Yes, there is a double standard.
"There is a big difference between what Bill was doing and what the newspaper did."
ReplyDeleteReally? How so?
The Nazis ideas are so abhorrent I don't give a damn if they have so-called rights.
ReplyDeleteThey all need to go to jail.
I wouldn't want to be on that jury, either.
ReplyDeleteIncidentally, that was a very good post by Anon.
Does this whole trial boil down to how people felt when Bill White threatened them, someone asked. It seems that way, thus far. What I think the prosecution is trying to do is to say that victimization is not just limited to violent acts. I think they are trying to establish that there were scars left by what he was doing. While not physical, the damages were emotional and the consequences far-reaching.
People had to move. People had to have police protection. Not just his targets, but their families were terrorized. In the case of Pitts and the tenants, a whole neighborhood was placed in turmoil. Will this approach fly with the jury? I don't know. I wouldn't be surprised to see another hung jury. If it is a true cross-cut of our society, there is bound to be a division just as there is in real life.
At any rate, I don't know how this play on emotions is going to look in the end. Do I want to see Bill locked away? I would say no if I thought he had learned something from all of this - but that's not the case, now, is it? I would say no if I thought that freeing him wouldn't create a real monster - but we all know better. If, however, he is convicted - I feel sure it will be appealed. And I would love to see a Supreme Court ruling on all of this.
"What I think the prosecution is trying to do is to say that victimization is not just limited to violent acts. I think they are trying to establish that there were scars left by what he was doing. While not physical, the damages were emotional and the consequences far-reaching." Nikki
ReplyDeleteYes, that does appear to be the backdoor the gov is seeking around the protections afforded by our Constitution.
If successful that is a dangerous precident set, and it is more disturbing that people like you wish for this to happen.
"""What I think the prosecution is trying to do is to say that victimization is not just limited to violent acts. I think they are trying to establish that there were scars left by what he was doing. While not physical, the damages were emotional and the consequences far-reaching." Nikki"""
ReplyDeleteYes, it is disturbing that there are people who would want freedom of speech to be officially ended. As to where it shouldn't apply if someones feelings were hurt or they were scared. We have "emotional consequences" from watching movies. Maybe we should include movies as well.
Leonard Pitts is a liar. His "fear" will really show when Bills lawyers disclose that he went directly to overthrow.com and threw up his own threats there. I do think I am recalling correctly that that was him. The same guy I told to take a hike and end the threats or I will be forced to call the authorities on him. It's too bad that web site isn't still up so this could be verified but I'm sure Bills lawyers have access to it.
Well, Hooch, if Pitts really did that the time for the defense to bring that up has passed. They should have done it on cross.
ReplyDeletePitts is a pet. He gets prizes for writing his one sided black power articles. He's ecouraged by white people to do this. He gets paid for it. He has more or less come up in a world that at least now, has told him that negroes can do no wrong in the eyes of white people. Want more proof? Heck, he was shocked that white people got upset about the Knoxville killings.
ReplyDeleteI don't feel sorry for Pitts. I don't care that his feelings got hurt. Maybe some white liberals should set aside a day to walk down the street flogging themselves and carrying his picture. I don't feel so inclined myself.
What is funny is how oblivious blacks like Pitts are to why they've angered people. Bill White was just one person who brought attention to the "cry me a river" issue. Now, white liberals understand why people were angry but it pisses them off because in their mind we should only look at things in a racial way when we are condeming white people, promoting black people and feeling sorry for Jewish people.
Pitts is either trying to play the jury or he's like a lot of blacks, oblivious on why people are angry at them. Ever watch Africa: Blood and Guts? There's a chapter in there where a handful of white mecenaries (a good friend of mine included) kick the ever living shit out some proud African army. So much for blacks being such strong warriors. Anyhow, after the fighting, they get the leader out there. He can't understand why people are upset that he burned white school children alive in their school house with their teacher. So he goes to his grave confused on why he's getting a summary execution. I watched the tape several times (now available on youtube) and I've come to the conclusion that the negro leader didn't have any idea what he'd done to get the white's backlash.
I say that in consideration of how Pitts also brings up lynchings a lot. He never considers that just as many whites were hung as blacks. He never thinks about what (if anything) the blacks may have done to anger the whites. It's a common reaction in blacks. We whites are taught that too. It's an area-effect process and in most people it only sinks in a little and normally gets thrown off with age. It's one more proof why blacks and whites can't live together and Pitts is a walking/talking example.
Did the defense cross-examine Mr. Pitts? You couldn't tell by reading the accounts of the Roanoke Times.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous, good post but you are getting off track.
ReplyDeleteThese people don't care about this sort of reasoning.
don't miss the comments on this blog
ReplyDelete"It isn't just about the Roanoke Times. Daryl Lamont Jenkins did almost the same exact thing as Bill (in regards to the publication of personal information) in his "rogues" gallery for "Those that don't play nice".
ReplyDeleteThe Daily Kos and Indymedia (well know leftist conglomerate) do many of the same things as Bill...well, actually from what I hear, worse...sometimes the left doesn't only threaten they actually follow through on them.
Latest example: What about the physical attack on David Erving?
Yes, there is a double standard."
That point can't be stressed enough.
Nikki has been busy stirring the pot here
ReplyDeleteI don't really like the Daily Kos all that much and anyone who has ever watched me post over there knows that they don't like me :) However, as long as I have been reading it, never have I ever seen them pull a Bill White and post personal information, then threaten them with violent visitation. I am not saying it hasn't happened but I have never seen it.
ReplyDeleteBut even if it did, it is just typical racist/right winged flawed thinking. Even if the left or the anti-racists did do it, doesn't make it right (pardon the pun). Ultimately Bill will be go to jail (or be found innocent) by his own actions. Regardless what DLJ, ADL, or Citizens Against Hate have done you must take responsibility for your own actions.
Hooch says, "Leonard Pitts is a liar." I've been reading Mr. Pitts for years now Hooch, there are many things I could call him but liar would not be one of them, the same can not be said for you. Tell us again Mr. Hooch how you are not a racist. Oh and spare me your double talk, I am a lot smarter than you and very tried of hearing your bullshit.
I think I may have seen Indymedia target people they considered rightwingers in the past.
ReplyDeleteZOG-bot "Dan Casey", self-appointed, Roanoke local "authority" on the Bill White 'show trial', gets his dirty kike-a-like ARSE handed to him by VNNrs Anchorage Activist, McKinley, Alex Linder & Rounder!
ReplyDelete"""Hooch says, "Leonard Pitts is a liar." I've been reading Mr. Pitts for years now Hooch, there are many things I could call him but liar would not be one of them,"""
ReplyDeleteNope, sorry, a liar IS one of them. I do consider a failure to mention the fact that he went to Overthrow and threw up his own threats a lie. And I am almost 100% positive I recall correctly and it was him.
I also recall that monkey white supremacist testifying against Bill saying on Overthrow that he went to Pitts house and he talked about his car which I believe is a blue Prius. Saying something like that figures the fagot would have a Prius. He didn't say he did anything to Pitts or that he was going to do anything to Pitts. I believe the freak was trying to act like a big bad "Scary" racist.
The people over at VNNF have no tact and are helping make the case for the VERY BIASED Roanoke Times.
ReplyDeleteI just wish VNNF would STFU.
IMHO Pitts wasn't scared of Bill White AT ALL. This is just an act for the show trial.
ReplyDeleteIt's part of the negro's survival instinct to play on the emotions of others. Pitts is no exception at all. His whole life has been build on the profits from white guilt. It's safe to say that even an honorable liberal would find him disgusting. The other blacks crying about how scared they were follow the same pattern.
ReplyDelete"Do unto others before they do unto us."
Latest report from Col. Kurtz:
ReplyDelete"The first FBI agent to testify on Monday, David Church, really didn't come off as an attack dog for the government. Instead, he appeared to only be going through the motions and giving monotonous, uninspired testimony. He made a feeble attempt to portray Bill White's words and actions as "threatening" , but, IMHO, was not successful. Upon cross-examination, Bill White's attorneys made mincemeat of Church's testimony. All said, I don't believe the jury was swayed either way by David Church.
The same was true for the second FBI agent to testify, Paul Messing, out of the FBI's Richmond office. When pressed by White's attorneys, Messing admitted he had read very, very little of White's columns or magazine's and even less of White's internet radio broadcasts, even though he was the FBI's chief forensic analyst and that was essentially his job. His testimony looked so weak, that apparently even he was aware of his shortcoming, and at the very end of his testimony, blurted/opined out that Bill White's mailings to the Virginia Beach negros appeared "threatening", in his opinion. In response to this desperate attempt to sway the jury under cross examination, Bill White's lawyer emphatically stated that Messing's opinion hadn't been solicited, heh.
This reporter's summary of the two negro women's testimony and the monetary award amounts they received from their HUD lawsuit against their Virginia Beach landlord, was posted last night by yours truly. And unlike the Roanoke Times reporter or the WSLS10 reporter, poor old Mr. Kurtz gets no compensation, heh. Pass the Kleenex, please.
My apologies again for interrupting the incessant drama. My bad. "
In my opinion, an all-white Roanoke jury isn't going to be good for BW.
ReplyDeleteCount on it.
"I only hope the jury has a few of us on it, and let him walk. He doesn't deserve this shit."--Proud White Guy
ReplyDeleteKurtz response and reporting from the courtroom to the above poster's question:
"From my observation of the all-White jury, I'd say that's a possibility. They all appear to be intelligent, even the few women, heh. And, especially during the sad testimony given by the two negro women Tiese Mitchell and Tascha Reddick, I sensed the jury felt the same revulsion as I did. In fact, it seemed the whole courtroom was attuned to the typical leechfuck, welfare-breeding, attitude of those government witnesses.
I'd post more reports from the courtroom action itself, as this thread is entitled "Ongoing Trial Coverage" and this is a "News Network", but I don't want to interfere with the interpersonal drama here that seems to be the better sell. Hey, ya gotta go with what sells, eh? heh
If any brave VNNers really want to see what it feels like to be in the belly of the beast, try showing up at the Poff Federal Courthouse and Bill White's trial. Then again, you could always take the MSM reporting as your only source of info. Cowards. Vanguard "News Network", meh.
I now return you to your regularly scheduled, never-ending futile debates and interpretations of Rounder's history, not to mention your various lovers' quarrels.
Heh, funny stuff "
Great news! Bill White's defense team exposed Richard Warman for having done some of same things on the Internet as Bill White.
ReplyDeleteNow, do you really think a jury can convict Bill White for essentially doing the same things that Richard Warman got away with?
"""Anonymous said...In my opinion, an all-white Roanoke jury isn't going to be good for BW."""
ReplyDeleteI disagree. A conservative jury which will already be tuned into peoples right to say what they wish, whether you like it or not, is the best he could possibly have. An all liberal jury would be certain doom.
Also, I don't agree that when a group of whites get together that they start thinking lets lynch the white guy.
They are more than likely thinking about the last time they said why don't you go eat shit and die to someone and how they better watch their mouth because the United States has slowly morphed over the years into a police state and the next head on the government block will be theirs.
Warman.... What a pile of ratshit that guy is.
ReplyDeleteBill White has brought this trial on himself. It wasn't his fellow compatriots or ARA that did it. It was Bill White thinking the constitution gave him the right to threaten and walk right over anybody he chose to. May they give him the full sentence.
ReplyDeleteThere is no "full sentence" for free speech dipshit.
ReplyDelete